If you haven't been living under a large rock like Patrick from Spongebob then you have probably heard about the controversial Google memo that has been the talk of all the new sites. The memo is titled "Google's Ideological Echo Chamber". If all you read is leftist trash like the Huffington Post and Lena Dunham's hysterical twitter rage fueled by hormones and the existential fear that she will never have kids, then you probably have heard that this memo is just a bunch of "anti-diversity" hate speech. What does it mean to be anti-diversity anyway? It probably means racist or something right?
No, it doesn't. Companies that focus on diversity instead of meritocracy tend to not make the best hires and therefore their business suffers. After all, who would like a well qualified and hard working straight white man when you can have an African American tranny in a wheelchair? Publisher of the conservative news site "GotNews.com" Chuck C. Johnson, partially built his media empire from investments shorting companies that started diversity initiatives. Johnson said that companies had a choice between dollars and diversity.
http://nationalvanguard.org/2016/09/social-justice-shorting-making-millions-by-betting-against-leftist-companies/
But why would companies choose diversity over dollars? Aren't all corporations evil capitalist enterprises with the one sole purpose of making money? Well this shows how deep the social justice conditioning is. Our education and media pushes the leftist narrative so hard that CEO's of companies like google feel it is a moral obligation to rack up as many diversity hires as possible. A Rebel Media by Faith Goldy looked into some of the twitter accounts of the employees at google and revealed that many of them were quite "diverse" as one might say. This included someone who described themselves as a polyamorous queer autistic trans lesbian.
So the straight white male, James Damore, who was behind the memo causing a huge uproar within the company only tried to explain why required diversity doesn't make sense in the workplace. He posted his memo anonymously but was later discovered and fired. Since then he has mostly been doing interviews with alternative media platforms. This is really sticking it to the mainstream media. James was called sexist by them just for explaining the reason there aren't as many women in tech. He didn't say that women shouldn't be in tech but he just explained why they aren't in tech. He listed many examples of differences between women and men such as that women tend to have higher anxiety and are on average less able to handle high stress situations.
All of the differences he said between men and women were scientific FACTS, and because he stated them he was fired. When did the left become anti-science? I thought it was supposed to be us republicans who didn't believe in science. This is because social justice is a religion. In fact it's almost just like christianity. It has the original sin (being white, straight, or male), it has a way to repent (flagellating yourself in front of minorities and women), and also christlike figures (Amy Schumer and Lena Dunham).
It enfuriates me how for so long the left has been the ones that don't need the facts. As a republican who often argues with liberals I constantly am asked to bring up studies even though I am not the one bringing up controversial points. Liberals can say whatever they want in the media because they are never asked to back it up with science, and this has to end!