Men, we should be ashamed of ourselves. We've done it again in Las Vegas. Our collective masculinity was just too toxic.
So toxic, we have less of it than ever before in history.
The Independent has called it, in their typical, factless-rag fashion. Testosterone is responsible for the Las Vegas shooting (even though hormonal birth control in the water table has substantially reduced it in western men, with sperm count dropping 60% in 40 years.)
I don't know how we ever made it through the times where women weren't literally peeing-men-into-becoming-women.
Men are a toxic gender by definition. We must root out all masculinity.
I can't say I care for this trend of obsessing over "whiteness" amid calls supported by socialists and the media from academics for "white genocide" being a good thing.
Put less eloquently...this is fucking textbook racism, and it needs to stop being accepted. This women should lose her job and, hopefully, every social connection with a decent human being she has.
Stick any other demographic in this phrase and this moron is fired in 3 seconds.
Holders of (preferably caucasian, at least, at first) penises, report to the dog food factory. Fido needs his share of Soylent Green.
Let's meet our accuser (warning: well-deserved hit-piece ahead)
Literally, her first tweet is simply gender-swapping the old "If you wore that dress, you asked for harassment," line one presumes she has whined about incessantly before.
Hey VICTORIA (you disingenuous, morally bankrupt, slime-ball of a human being), maybe WOMEN shouldn't go out alone if being raped or harassed is such a risk. Not all men are rapists and harassers but you just can't tell who is.
Doesn't sound SO GREAT, does it, you vile, dishonest spreader-of sexism and hatred?
It is both sad, and entirely expected, that her FIRST VISIBLE tweet would contain a contradiction to her own ideology so large that, frankly, I could simply end this article here, call her a moron, and my work would be done. It's hardly worth even taking down someone who is operating on a grade-school level of logical reasoning.
However, I can't resist. Corrosive influences like this must be taken to task and shamed, publicly, back into the closet of idiocy from whence they emerged.
Because, the sad fact is, when you don't shame the vitriolic 10% or less of disgusting humans who treat half the species as an enemy to gain social standing and privilege, you empower pathetic male feminists like Michael Moore to temporarily remove the hot-dog he is fellating at any given time and burp out trial-balloons the practically-fascist State just loves to have floating around the public consciousness:
This is a literal Jim Crow law for men. We now have public calls for writing different laws based on whether or not you have a penis.
I want to help Michael Moore with his application to "Bigots, Sexists, and Assholes Anonymous", so I made some minor edits to his bigoted diatribe to highlight his logical fallacies:
Shit, this stereotyping thing is really easy, actually!
Victoria is well aware of the disgusting and spiteful nature of her opinions lies. Her ideology is so hateful, and completely unable to stand-up to any debate, that she has the (as yet) only "private" Wordpress I have ever seen:
I literally did not know this was even an option. A truly pathetic move.
She is severely guilty of the very first "crime" she painted feminism with just 3 years ago, almost on a daily basis:
This could be an attempt at satire. It's executed too poorly to tell.
The positive correlation between "raging angry feminist" and "(almost) too gross to ever get laid" is approaching a mathematically-perfect 1.0. This isn't a joke - it's a very simple and expected social result. Women who have the mind, looks, skills, or personality to actually achieve anything in society (or the intelligence to see third-wave feminism as a female-supremacy movement) do not need to spend their whole life making half of their own species into a straw-man enemy in an endless attempt to try to derive privilege from their genital plumbing.
Seen any Brad Pitt's in the MGToW sphere, lately? How odd that there are no underwear models among feminisms male analogues.
As you can see in Victoria's male stunt-double (pictured left, obviously), convincing anyone immediately that you are ridiculous is not an effective means of promoting your message.
Feminists like her will openly acknowledge this truth of human nature while they "take down" MGTOWs and whoever else they deem must have chosen their insular ideologies for 'being losers who can't get laid, so they hate women', but will completely ignore the irony that when the same correlation is pointed out in their ranks, the shrill denials are overpowering from the collective of the lesbian-haired.
When not spewing vitriol, "Glosswitch" often wonders why she is no longer invited to parties.
Does anyone actually disagree that the above looks like some sort of mentally-deranged Bingo card for SJW idealogues? That is almost her entire author page at "The Independent." I didn't edit or rearrange anything. In fact, I had to cut off even more all-feminist articles to fit it into one image.
So there you have it, masculinity is responsible for all violence. Right?
If a top ranked website which claims to be "journalism" says it, it's gotta be true, right?
The only thing they are "Independent" of is any connection to reality.
I know that seems odd (read: completely at odds with reality, but makes "muh feels" good,) given lesbian couples have the highest rates of domestic violence and gay couples the lowest, but that sounds dangerously close to fact based, logical thinking, mister, and might be interpreted as patriarchy.
I guess all the lesbian anger at the patriarchy just can't be held in.
Speaking of eschewing fact-based, logical thinking, is anyone able to explain the endless support for increasing gun control amid a non-stop campaign crying that we live in a "rape-culture?" Is there any non-fictional tool better equipped to prevent a rape than a legally-carried concealed pistol?
Still shittier than a gun. Maybe we can consult Minority Report.
Let's be honest. I'm no bodybuilder, yet the number of women I could phsyically overpower is pretty much all of them that aren't actively fighting in the UFC. I could take most of you two or more at once.
However, hand a 12 year old with a handgun safety course under her belt a pistol and suddenly I may be a (huge) underdog.
This is a poster child for "never going to be raped," ...or without a prom date.
Why would those at a statistical self-defense disadvantage bordering on the insurmountable, choose to (attempt to) outlaw the most advanced technology ever created to utterly equalize that disadvantage, and instead place their total safety into the hands of the very-same "patriarchy" they bitch about controlling them endlessly?
Is Victoria a complete idiot, or a statist plant? It can only be one of the two.
Perhaps she just likes having more women victims to add to her hateful blogroll.
Doesn't preventing law abiding women from owning guns to prevent themselves from this myriad of rapes we are told they fear on a daily basis constitute the dictionary definition of restricting women's rights? Misogyny, anyone?
If world history was printed on Whole Foods bags, maybe Victoria would know the first thing about it.
Note the feminist solipsism completely rejects the inarguable truth that the Second Amendment exists to prevent a monopoly on force by the government. It hand-waves away a 250+-year right critical to the maintenance of republic and prevention of dictatorships with an exhortation to create a better slave population to produce more 1984-like obedience to a wholly corrupt and bankrupt state - the very same state she whines endlessly is an "oppressive patriarchy".
Perhaps we should start a GoFundMe to send Victoria (permanently) to Venezuela. It sounds like it would be her paradise.
Virtue-signalling Supreme Court repressing (non-feminist, obviously) women while Rome burns... the end results of SJW and Feminism leading to the entitlement-train of Socialism.
Apparently, these feminist nutjobs want to prevent women from having the tools to protect themselves (or be employed)...whether that be from the patriarchy of the state, or a random rapist. Victoria finds it preferable to place the entirety of her (their) protection into the "big, manly" hands of the police and the state. I wonder if Victoria has enough IQ to realize her position is a large cry for relinquishing all her responsibility and agency to the "patriarchy of men" who will "protect" her?
Does she realize her own argument is calling for the infantilization of women on a grand scale?
Her position makes me think of her as a child...a sad, adult child, desperately pulling on "Daddy State's" coat-tails to come protect her from the big bad man she's is just too weak and has too little agency, thanks to her own attempts to infantilize her own gender, to fight on her own.
But clearly, masculinity is the problem... (after all, it only constructed pretty much all of science and civilization). We should get rid of it as quickly as possible!
It's all the patriarchy's fault, and has nothing to do with women avoiding STEM like the plague.
Shit, get those facts out of here, pronto. You'll ruin the gender wage gap myth.
If masculinity is the problem, let's put all the power in the hands of the most masculine, controlling hands of the police and military and let them solve it. We'll call it "feminist triumph," instead of "actively working against our own, women's, and all freedom-loving people's interests," because that sounds way better. Girl powah!
I seriously don't know how this bitch manages to get dressed in the morning, she is that brain-dead.
Does anyone really believe a cold, calculating killer with premeditation spanning weeks, months, or even years is going to be stopped by having to pay an extra $200 for black market weapons?
Is this why we must blame an entire gender for the actions of single individuals with demonstrable mental illness?
Victoria would have loved the unabashed identity politics of the 1930's and 1940s:
I re-wrote this so "Glosswitch" can take a time-machine back to 1940 and cross-publish it in Der Sturmer.
There is a fear of guns at work here that has nothing to do with any rational worries about safety. It's about controlling you and creating a permanent safe space for the enemies of freedom. Cancerous ideologues like this will destroy any system if given the opportunity.
That fear is going to keep coming for your second amendment rights. It won't matter that it will empower criminals and increase crime. No tears other than yours will be shed for any friends and family assaulted, or whose properties are broken into, in preventable crimes.
Look out when that fear teams up with third wave feminism. They're going to come for ALL your guns, including the ones attached to you.
Welcome to 2017 – where we have met the enemy, and it is...a shrill, lunatic fringe minority of SJW feminists.
PS - Victoria, you are a revolting (on numerous levels), sexist, racist, misandrist and misogynist bigot, and a pusher of identity politics. Your work doesn't deserve to grace the National Enquirer. As a writer, you are intellectually devoid of even a shred of honesty, and if you want a frank assessment from someone who is 100x the writer and intellectual you will ever be, you fucking suck.
You are a horrible person and you should feel terribly, terribly bad that all you have accomplished with your life is spewing hateful ideology. You've made over half the species your enemy, labelled them toxic, and we'd all appreciate it if you'd just get the fuck out of Earth, permanently.
Also, I seriously question the IQ of anyone so totally brainwashed by progressive SJW'ism. Based on the level of your writing and reasoning, you would have been unable to successfully debate (a younger) me at any point past the 5th grade. You make even a poor caricature of a statist, as your arguments are so transparently deconstructed by their own internal inconsistencies, you fail to be a useful tool of propaganda. Even if an audience of exclusively highly-impressionable idiots could be found, one wonders if you could turn even a single one to your hateful position.
It comes as no surprise you are clamoring for additional privelege ascribed to your gender; it is only logical that those severely disadvantaged by the hand of genetics (on both a physical and mental level) would seek any other means but meritocracy to raise themselves up.
(Mic drop.)
Victoria, even gay-fish-men will not want to have sex with you. Lose the haircut.
If you have any additions or errata for this post in support of Victoria, I don't want to hear them. GTFO of my blog. If you support this trash, go follow Craig-Grant instead, because neither I nor any thinking member of humanity want you around.
Try SteemFollower today and get rewarded for every vote and follow!
Join us at the Minnow Support Project! (click me)
We also have a Radio Station! (click me)
...and a 5000+ active user Discord Chat Server! (click me)
Sources: PreventConnect.Org, CDC, Google, Twitter, The Hill, Zero Hedge, Statista, Nobel Group, Ellen Fishbein, The Independent (lol)
Copyright: A Short-Haired Mental-Defective, Star Wars, Pinterest, The Rebel, YouTube, KnowYourMeme, South Park, The Simpsons