As you can see in the latest post from 
Even if vaccinations were 'safe and effective', no-one has the right to decide what others put in their own bodies
There are very long lists of medical doctors, vaccine researchers and other kinds of medical professionals who stake their reputation on teaching us that vaccines are 'junk science'. The basis of this understanding is multi-dimensional and the issues range from the toxicity of the so-called 'adjuvants' that are added to vaccines that are known to OVER
'stimulate' the immune system, right through to the reality that the immune system works best when not 'hacked' in such a way, meaning that we need to strengthen our own natural immunity with a broad spectrum of healthy choices, rather than risk weakening our overall natural immunity by bombarding the body with synthetic concoctions of poison.
Regardless of any of this, however, there is an ever more important point here - WE HAVE NO RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT SOMEONE ELSE PUTS IN THEIR OWN BODY (OR IN THE BODY OF A CHILD THEY CARE FOR) - PROVIDED NO-ONE'S WILL IS BEING OVERPOWERED.
I have no right to choose whether or not you can take a drug into your body, or certain foods - as long as your choices do not overpower the will and rights of others. This is where things can get complicated if we don't know our own self sufficiently to be able to discern what is needed for our body and wellbeing.
It's not just our 'rights' that need to be respected, but FREE WILL MUST be respected for us to know balance
It is generally understood that the will is sacred and to be respected, however, there are still many among us who deny this and seek to overpower the will of others - we sometimes call them 'control freaks' and they gravitate towards governments.
It is generally understood that if you find another human attractive and want them to be your partner, for example, you cannot achieve that by forcing them against their will to join you in life. There are 'rules' in government to prevent this from occurring, however, there is currently a lack of clear delineation in society about what to do in the more complex situations, such as with child rearing. In this case with vaccinations, it IS the will of the child that is important as to whether they have vaccinations and contrary to the narrative projected by some in society, many children are intelligent enough to make up their own minds. In the case of babies who are not able to comprehend the situation or express themselves verbally, then it IS up to the parents to decide and NOT up to the 'state'.
Children are the creations of parents, NOT the creations of people who 'got elected' to government - note: it has already been made abundantly clear that modern democracies were carefully crafted since the beginning to be false fronts that give the impression of being democratic, but are in truth just a control system.
If we allow 'elected officials' to decide on concoctions of drugs and chemicals to be forcibly introduced into the systems of babies - many WILL die as a result. Where does it stop? What occurs when it is decided that a new strain of genetics is 'totally safe and effective' and will 'enhance life' and that if parents don't allow pharmaceutical agents to insert them into their children then they are being 'neglectful'? This outcome was the stuff of dystopian science fiction not long ago and yet it is now only just around the corner.
Loving Enlightenment is needed now.
There is one consistent solution to all these problems and that is actual, lived enlightenment. Enlightenment is not about living in a cave or wearing a robe and praying. Enlightenment is literally 'Understanding' in the sense of being the light that holds the truth of self and all that is. It is possible to have UNloving enlightenment, which results in evil deeds that on a certain level can be said to be 'intelligent' but overall will lack the emotional understanding necessary to produce truly beneficial outcomes. The invention of nuclear weapons is one such outcome of unloving enlightenment.
Loving enlightenment is balanced and causes balance. The love involves opens deep doorways into the unconscious self that facilitate a very deep awareness that is uncommon on earth presently. The wisdom that can be generated through such balance and knowingness must not be underestimated and cannot be guessed or judged in advance.
The forcing of drugs and vaccinations on people (including fluoridation of water) is very much an unloving and thus unbalanced action - regardless of how 'caring' those who propose it claim to be. To propose such a program is to also propose that:
- The proposer knows better than others who disagree with him/her about the human anatomy and health. Thus he/she also knows better than literally billions of people he/she has never met.
- The proposer therefore, is calling a large percentage of the population: unintelligent, uncaring & dangerous - just for making free will choices for their own health (Which numerous medical professionals heartily respect them for and who agree with their decisions).
- The proposer does NOT respect FREE WILL.
The fact that free will is being denied and that this is attempting to be made an 'official policy' should ring alarm bells for everyone - because this is EXACTLY how a dictatorship and authoritarian regimes (That think nothing of killing millions) operate.
If the proposers in the Australian government (and elsewhere) are to operate within integrity, they must acknowledged the potential tyranny in their chosen position and respect that others disagree with them and are free to choose as they prefer. If they do not accept the truth of this then they are only proving that THEY, the proposers, are truly enemies of humanity.
Wishing you well,
Ura Soul
Buy your "Steemit, Dreamit, Memeit, Teamit" T-Shirts, Gifts & Other Clothing Here.