On December 6, 2006, the girl Tair Rada of Katzrin was murdered . She was 13 when she died. Her body was found in the toilet of her school. About a week after the murder, Roman Zadorov was arrested on suspicion of murdering the girl. A few weeks ago, an investigative report was broadcast on "Second Look" about the murder, and it raises questions about Zadorov's guilt.
What do you mean?
I am neither a judge nor the son of a judge, but from the investigation of the first channel, I was accused of lying, trying to find a scapegoat, the main thing is to end this sad affair.
Roman Zadorov, the building worker who was arrested and convicted in the end, is a simple construction worker of Russian origin, who finds it very difficult in Hebrew. Most of his interrogation was conducted in Hebrew and even in high Hebrew, while stammering fragments in Hebrew and Russian indicating that he did not understand what he was being asked. Later he was joined by a dubbed who spoke to him in Russian, and his job was to persuade Zdorov to confess to the murder. Zdorov admitted it and then retracted it.
However, both the reconstruction and Zadorov's responses in the interrogation room raise many matters that are inconsistent with the findings in the ring, which apparently shows that Zadorov did not commit the murder. To this were the testimonies that were collected and, more importantly, the findings from the scene of the murder - and you received an innocent person who, only because of his weak character, gave in to the pressure and admitted what he had not done.
The investigators claimed that Zadorov had found his DNA and that the traces of his shoes were in the ring. Which was a complete lie-no DNA was found, no traces of shoes matching his shoes. There were also hairs that did not match his hair, blood that was not blood, and traces of small shoes suitable for children.
In his interrogation Zadorov claimed that Rada's hair was tied in a braid, while in the scene she was found in scattered hair. Zadorov also admitted that he had stabbed her with a knife that he used for his work, while the best researchers claimed that Rada was apparently murdered with a serrated knife and not with a knife like that found in Zadorov's tools. Zadorov also invented details that were not compatible with the findings on the ground. All this and more testify that Zadorov is not the murderer of Tair Rada, and he admitted to murder out of pressure, fear and weakness.
To the police, and unfortunately to the judges, it was very easy to convict a new immigrant from Russia, a confused and weak man, than to try to study the truth.
You do not have to be a judge to notice all these contradictions. Zdorov may have committed the murder, and perhaps even more so. What is certain is that they hastened to accuse and convict him without thoroughly examining the findings and the evidence. The many questions raised in the affair and the contradictions between Zadorov's reconstruction and his findings require a renewed examination of the situation. It is very possible that Tair Rada's killer is still walking freely between us.
I do not judge this sad story. But the collection of evidence and findings must turn red light on the mind of every person and judge mainly - and order the reopening of the case for further investigation. It will be very sad and especially outrageous and annoying if we have another case of "Amos Burns
