Democrats are not the only ones who are searching for more answers from Robert Mueller about his investigation into the Trump campaign and its ties to the Russians.
It appears that Mueller was not completely forthcoming with some of the evidence that was presented to him.
Konstantin Kilimnik was mentioned as a sinister link to Russia was, in fact, an informant for the United States State Department. He had ties to both Russia and the Ukraine.
And, despite the Mueller report suggesting Kilimnik is a Russian stooge, state officials told the FBI that he did not appear to hold any allegiance to the Kremlin, and had been "flabbergasted at the Russian invasion of Crimea."
Mueller obviously left this out of his report on purpose. The fact he indicted one of the more valued informants of the State Department shows how an agenda was in play. It is not as if he was not aware of the ties between Kilimnik and the Ukraine government.
Purcell told the FBI that Kilimnik provided "detailed information about OB (Ukraine's opposition bloc) inner workings" that sometimes was so valuable it was forwarded immediately to the ambassador. Purcell learned that other Western governments relied on Kilimnik as a source, too.
"One time, in a meeting with the Italian embassy, Purcell heard the Italian ambassador echo a talking point that was strikingly familiar to the point Kilimnik had shared with Purcell," the FBI report states. -The Hill
And Mueller mentioned none of this in his report despite knowing about it since 2018 - more than a year before the final report.
Why was all this left out of the report? It did not fit the agenda that the investigation had.
This news will most likely renew the Republicans vigor towards investigating the investigation. If the Mueller Report is used as grounds for impeachment when key facts were purposely left out, then he is walking the fine line of Treason.
To read full article, click on image.
