I'll give this a watch when I have a chance, as I can then give a more thoroughly structured rebuttal on your position(s) and highlight some of the things we may agree upon.

With that said, I think its perhaps a dire indication of what I can expect as both an anti-nuclear person and as an anarchist when I saw the following as your relevant tags: nuclearplants, anarchy, volutnaryism, facts.

The FACT of the matter is that NUCLEARPLANTS are about the most anti-ANARCHISTIC and VOLUNTARYIST (sp?) thing imaginable or what we Humans have conceived to date. They require HUGE initial budget outlays, that always require the funding of a nation-state and consume large amounts of relevant resources (contractors/engineers/local planning and designers/decommissioning/waste management/inspection I can go on here but you get the idea); they are often constructed using critical bodies of water and are surrounding residential neighborhoods that existed before the plant and have undergone massive militarization since 9/11. Not to mention the fact that the byproducts and waste have half-lifes of 100's of millions of years, thus it would be impossible to say that anyone after our brief existence on this planet would have conceded or was even capable of volunteering into a system which utilizes nuclear energy in any capacity.

This of course this assumes they even work as they intended to without complications, as we have seen when they do melt-down/melt-through the diffusion of responsibility has dire consequences for the whole planet, reaching those those who never benefited from it nor have electricity of there own.