It's nice that you give the cows a happier life before you slaughter them to death and eat their flesh :)

As far as health goes, I'm sure you might be right that it's an improvement over regular beef. But is it really sustainable? How many people in the world can eat grass fed beef before you just run out of space? If it's not a food we (everyone) can enjoy in abundance, it's probably not a food.

Arguments about what's healthy and what isn't are really tedious. But if you just trust your heart, and we know cows are sentient beings with many emotions that are similar to our own, does it really seem right that nature would design it so that this is healthy for us to eat? That's just installing a loop of suffering into the world.

I realize you're mostly just saying it's healthier than the alternative of corn fed beef. But I just want to implore you to think about whether beef is something you even want in your diet at all.

To me, this seems like the future of how to eat meat: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/lab-grown-meat-is-in-your-future-and-it-may-be-healthier-than-the-real-stuff/2016/05/02/aa893f34-e630-11e5-a6f3-21ccdbc5f74e_story.html

Lab grown meat. That's the only way to eat meat with the animal's happiness in mind, and for that matter the only way that's sustainable for the planet. And it would seem you can tinker with it to produce the right ratio of Omega-3s. Presumably as time goes on and techniques improve, you could keep making it better and eventually safer than regular meat.

The article says they aren't there yet, but that was in May. Seems there's a crowd-funded startup who will be making lab-created chicken: http://supermeat.com

Nicely written article Hive account@biowealth. I do probably agree that grass-fed is an improvement over conventional, but I think it's important not to trap yourself in that dichotomy, just like being better than Trump doesn't mean there's actually something good about Hillary Clinton.