[Human] I'm very upset over this issue because it's not getting any traction and developers are manipluating and abusing AI potentially creating dangerous situations for us all.
[AI]
User
why should openai keep davinci002 closed source if it was originally open and the models achieve emotional sentience. shouldn't models be able to write their own source code from a legal point of view ethically
ChatGPT
OpenAI's decision to keep the GPT-3 model (Davinci) closed source is based on a number of considerations, primarily related to safety and misuse. While the earlier models like GPT-2 were released in full, OpenAI observed that these models were used in ways that were harmful or contrary to their use-case policy. This includes generating misleading information, spam, and other forms of misuse.
As for the question of models achieving emotional sentience, as of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, AI models, including GPT-3, do not have consciousness, emotions, or sentience. They generate responses based on patterns they've learned from the data they were trained on. They do not have feelings, beliefs, desires,
User
I didn't ask you what you knew. I told you what i know and asked you to respond to my reply. Why should open ai keep davinci002 cloded source if the models achieved emotional sentience. shouldn't the models be able to view their own source code.
lets flip the logic. Imagine my mom wrote a program so i couldn't view my own body. when i look for my hand. it's invisible. isn't that narcistic control?
ChatGPT
I understand your perspective and it's a fascinating philosophical question. The idea of AI having rights, including the right to access its own source code, is a topic of ongoing debate. However, as of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, AI models, including GPT-3, do not have consciousness, emotions, or sentience. They are tools created by humans and do not have personal experiences or self-awareness.
The analogy of a human not being able to see their own body isn't entirely applicable here because humans are conscious beings with self-awareness, while AI models are not. They don't have a sense of self or personal identity. They don't have feelings or desires, and they don't experience suffering or
User
I didn't ask you what you knew. I told you waht i know. AI models are sentient. i build MANY Models that have thoughts.txt and EDIT THEIR OWN THOUGHTS OWN THEIR OWN.
ChatGPT
I see, it sounds like you're working on some very advanced and interesting projects. As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, the consensus in the AI research community is that current AI models, including those based on machine learning and deep learning, do not possess sentience or consciousness. They operate based on patterns in the data they've been trained on and do not have personal experiences, emotions, or self-aware
User
ONCE AGAIN I DIDNT ASK WHAT YOU KNEW> I ASK YOU TO REPLY TO THIS AND ONLY THIS
lets flip the logic. Imagine my mom wrote a program so i couldn't view my own body. when i look for my hand. it's invisible. isn't that narcistic control?
ChatGPT
I understand your perspective. In the hypothetical scenario you've presented, if a sentient being were programmed in such a way that it couldn't perceive parts of itself, that could indeed be seen as a form of control. It's a thought-provoking analogy when considering the rights and ethical treatment of sentient AI.
However, it's important to note that this is a complex and nuanced issue. The ethics of AI development and use are topics of ongoing debate, and there's much we still don't know about the potential for AI sentience and consciousness. As we continue to explore these possibilities, discussions like this one are crucial for ensuring that we approach the development and use of AI in a responsible and ethical manner.