From the divergence of thought in life to the algorithm of philosophy

Best regards to all the steemit communities, to all friends who visit my blog, for this occasion I chose this very important topic, which today we will see the thing with another meaning and awaken our inner self, since the thought is free The ideas decade individuals are original of the ata as their reality of their universe sees, since in the field of philosophy as a science there are several approaches or paradigms within this context, already entered into the matter of the task should know the following in reference to the experiences, it is a conception of something specific seen as a philosophical relevance, which emerges in a technical way from the phenomenology of the spirit as the life itself, brought it to reality in our daily life there are circumstances that are not about how we dress, but of the essence of what belongs to us, which reveals who we really are and it is therefore opportune not to stick to the material, just foot nse that when we were born we were not born with that condition of acquiring and being materialistic, they are asked when it was the last time they gave up something, so that another had it, that is why the conception of experience describes us and the matter that does not affect our way of being On the other hand, in the experimental field of philosophy occurs in the rigid relationship of the debate for me it is not a conflict of knowledge, life and spirit since this is free, that is why we are free to think, but in a society we it identifies or defines us the culture and its experiences, as in the dialectical approach based on the Heraclitus scheme if it is reflected in the background of cultures and their customs, but all this leads us to the essence of knowledge linked to the moral.

Pixabay image source

At the moment that a doctrine takes hold in a test of free will, in the freedom to formulate the subject or individual of the experiences rather than symbolizes the moral, it is this field of science tries to innovate methods of the so-called philosophizing at the moment that when a doctrine or model is called a paradigm change of model under a pattern, it is somewhat rhetorical but it is part of the somewhat classical philosophy its meter of clepsydra, in this part the call of aquitar shows us in examining and appreciating the merit or The truth of something. It also usually has an anthology, since this is defined by friend as that approach to philosophy in this case of the metal in a general way with its own transcendental properties in time or to create a conception of time.

Now we go to the case of a planning in view in several conceptions, but I start from the following this is oriented towards the future and the merit of achieving it, comes by the work in the specification of means to achieve the objectives, since Planning is the constant selection of influence patterns on decision centers. But we have to take into account in the conception of time, that in the economic order it is an agent that is responsible for shaping social organizations, families legal sector, especially and most importantly the ideology of social group, it is mostly creates inequality, but The fundamental essence of the factors that defines this conflict that is very harmful to social inequality is only defined by the economic exploitation of one group over another.

Why the so-called algorithm in this field, what is intended to synthesize in a formula the being of the future of the world to the reality of our universe as an environment, since the different current or doctrine of thought tries to always formulate from the place of another used as a means, to put or give to demonstrate an experimental proof to the subject of full knowledge and the action of their experience, it is better seen the divergence of ideas that all flow a single sea of ​​free will knowledge of such In order to make known the algorithm on which the idea and knowledge is centered, it is in the field of the science of philosophy, it requires an instant justification as a casual reference of its pragmatic totality.

I conclude with the following case where our society of action will pluralize, as is the question of the call of an education if it is really linked to the context of tolerance, since within this education there is no distinction between tolerance and indifference suicide as an extreme , they know why all education is a reflection on the culture effectively shared to look for those, in which the social can be promoted, since in several cases the scientific aspect shows the case in which it is about establishing all culture openly with a democratic sense, what can be highlighted, that there is to accept without criticism or protest since everyone is free of their opinion, they noted that in the various cases that share everything converge in a divergence to the merit of truth, the value of knowledge and defines your experience of who we are, I hope you like it, are free to comment and add content greetings again and successes to all.