Today I criticized Proctor and Gamble on Facebook, calling them out for discrimination against men and the autistic.
A few hours later about as I was to push send for a response, I see a month and a half old post get flagged by Facebook as violating the community standards. Technically the post is still free speech, even if Facebook doesn't have an constitutional duty to protect free speech on their platform. Furthermore, I stand behind what I said. I am against violence against women, and the best way to stop it is to get rid of the family courts that actually encourages violence against women.
It was neither a true threat, nor, especially after a month had passed, was it incitement. But we all know what this is about. It was about preventing me from further criticizing proctor and gamble and responding from an organizational response. You'l probably observe that whenever you are discussing a topic the liberals don't like on social media, out pops a Facebook violation of community standards from months...even years ago.
Seriously take your pick. Who would you rather have killed if it is going to happen anyways, the woman or the judge? I choose the judge who acted in violation of the law, rather than a woman who was railroaded to the slaughterhouse by the domestic violence industry. Are we not allowed to have opinions about law and justice. What if I were to say we should all go to the legislature to criminalize family court judges for their prior restraints and give them the death penalty? Or instead of death, how about kidnapping and extorting them. You know the basis of the enforceability of any bill is the advocacy that force, no matter how violent, should be the result. To effectively prevent all calls for violence is to effectively stop all legislatation. Oh gee, that guy killed x>4 people or a cop, and was convicted, he should be fried. Maybe such a post should violate the Facebook community standards too. Leave it to Facebook to keep us dumb-twitter even dumber.
It is as Ayn Rand wrote,
"Did you really think we want those laws observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it. . . There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with."
-Atlas Shrugged
Just initiate a conversation the sjw left doesn't like, and you will be silenced from the debate for other things.
Anyways, always make it a habit to document the big tech censorship going on.
I've decided today to ween myself from Facebook. I've also seen in this community standards section that Facebook delete some of my reviews on Facebook without notifying me also.
Soon as my account is back, I'll leave an image there for my friends and spies saying I've moved to Gab. Eventually I'll move over to oratione.com .