Quality is such a touchy subject because it’s a subjective thought. People say they want to see good content but everybody has a different opinion on what good content is. That’s subjective and out right judge mental to vote this type of way. People don’t even realize they are being subjective when they say things like “the content has to be good”. First of all, who are you to say that the content has to be good?? Why do you think you can choose good content? You’re the good content chooser now?? Who made you think like that? Is that a forced opinion that steem has been dragging along?? most of us are NOT journalist so if “content has to be good” needs to meet these standards then most of us should t be getting votes. I like the idea that you vote who you know but then again is that the right way to go about using your upvote? Especially when new people are signing up everyday? Idk ... nobody needs to be subjected to someone’s opinion especially because they just been around long ...none of this makes sense to do. As a producer/artist we learn that creation is part of the process but not the whole process.. the artistry comes after the creation but if I were to critique someone’s beats it would be subjective the same way. Who am I to say the beat is wack?? Nobody is in a position to say that content is good or bad and that shouldn’t be the way you use your upvote. Maybe find a different less subjective way to use it