Hi, I enjoyed your article and like where your thoughts are headed. I want to offer a principle I've adopted, take it for what it's worth. Labeling and defining another's viewpoint, especially the viewpoint of the majority, weakens an argument and weakens it's persuasiveness. I'm thinking about "Statist" here. It's a very popular term in crypto and anarco capitalist circles, but I think it serves to create an "other," serves only to speak to the group (crypto circles and anarco capitalist circles), not those outside of the group, which means it weaken the argument's persuasiveness.
Thank you for your article.
RE: Innovating consensus and the rise of governance-as-a-service