Sometimes it's surprising what you will hear politicians honestly admit to. Take for example the New Zealand Prime Minister openly admitting that she is creating two classes of citizens. That that was the goal, and there's nothing wrong with that. That's pretty insane for someone to admit to doing, in addition to actually having that done and most of the population being okay with it.
As another case with Nichola Sturgeon, who admits that the goal of the community are vaccine passports is to drive uptake, and that you can't or shouldn't allow any alternative treatments when that is your goal.
https://twitter.com/drduncanryan/status/1462485388057100289
- drduncanryan
So what this is saying is that in order to drive vaccine uptake, you had to punish people who were not. That's what the passport is for those who are not compliant penalized for not being compliant while those who do comply with what the government wants get rewarded.
Whats also absurd is that she is essentnially admitting that there are alternatives to the vaccine. But to allow those alternatives to be used, or even to talk about them in social media, and allow people to know about them, would undermine the effort to promote the vaccination program.
The vaccination program, that was touted as safe and effective, but has been shown to not be so safe, nor that effective. The vaccination program that seemingly only had a positive for big pharmaceutical companies who made billions.
They aren't completely safe, because as they've tried to deny early on when the data was coming out about strokes and heart issues and any other issues, they've later had to admit that, begrudgingly. And even then, few who support the narrative and the push for vaccination even want to talk about it or admit that there are safety issues.
And how can something that was only tested for safety for a few months actually make an honest claim that it is safe and normally it takes years to determine the safety profile. It doesn't matter if you have everyone on the planet working on determining something safety, it takes time for health consequences to emerge from the administration of a product into the body, such as an injection.
The effectiveness is only essentially for three months, and by six months the data shows many studies that the antibodies are essentially all gone, contrary to a natural immunity with the antibodies are still present and even Nature published a paper saying that if you have natural immunity will probably make antibodies for a lifetime.
That's why they are now pushing for minimum six months boosters, and in some cases boosters every three months. That's 2 to 4 injections per year of these demonstrably not so safe and not very effective injections.