Should politicians accused of offenses get the benefit of the doubt until a court rules?
I was going to write a long post on this (I say we can each decide as we like), but this piece from The Beaverton I think explains it all rather well.
Should politicians accused of offenses get the benefit of the doubt until a court rules?
I was going to write a long post on this (I say we can each decide as we like), but this piece from The Beaverton I think explains it all rather well.
