How information travels is extremely difficult to guess. Yes, some are more likely or less likely, depending on how the information is handed over. In steemit, a good descriptive title could very well be the difference between success or failure. The difference of someone reading the post or not at all is highly subjective. Not everyone is a college professor that would read "A History of Science and the basis thereof" and that is a good thing!
How is it that some would aspire to learn more and common misperceptions
Most people on a daily basis discuss gossip,cars, houses in the market and some discuss their perceived view of the economy.Due to this fact, only a few individuals retained their taught skills and knowledge from school. They become more skill specific and therefore less inclined to remember geography or history from the first world war. This information is simply not required.
Those who make it their concern for the wellbeing of others as well as theirs ordinarily retains information that could lead to better and more informed actions/debates. Due to the fact that the majority of people tend not to listen to words of wisdom, they tend to make ill-informed decisions. Mostly because they have forgotten the wisdom of earlier spoken words...
Telling someone they are making a mistake is like,
putting a lock on the door and throwing the key away, followed by some TNT...
This is normal and happens to the most of us. And yet that is the only way, to claim a victory later on? Maybe we should not take it personally... Right,like that is going to happen.
Now we can see that only some would be actively searching for facts and actively point them out. Of these few individuals how many have the intelligence or ability to pay for school or college? This trend undeniably leads to groups of intellectual individuals regardless of wealth that has the ability to find the facts and come to an informed opinion on a subject or topic.
The misperception
The person that speaks the most or is the most bullish is "Right" and "Popular",cause who are you? The sad part is; perceiving that someone is popular leads to them being popular...
Now for the relative, few that has both will,understanding and ability to "*MAKE HARD DECISIONS" are a rare few. This inevitably leads to groups or societies being formed that has a disproportionate amount of power. However, these organic organizations or societies does not have disproportionate power compared to their intellect and their will to do good. Much like steemit/steem.
Yes, there are individuals with a different view as yourself, but that is okay. The debate is always welcome and tends to be towards a better future. With the exception of ,said debate , being an intellectual and civilized debate. Should there be one person or persons in such a community that could deceive or manipulate the debate would have excessive power. And now it makes sense how it could be seen as some "invisible hand" is shaping the world. Because it is what is happening and it is obvious is nature.
- Only some care enough to vote.
- Only some are able and "up-to-date" to make an informed decision.
- Only some are popular and/or intelligent enough to vote for president.
- Our perceived idea of "self" is, to some degree, distorted based on the media we consume.
- Our will to fight the status-quo is less than adequate.
The idea of this or that murder case always intrigues me
This is my view or views on the criminal justice system.
Person A has had a neglected childhood in whatever form(Rich kids could be neglected as well). Person, A is prone to violence because of that gets labeled " a troublesome child" Person A has a need of attention(like us all) or rather the sense of being accepted on some level. PersonA has to the best of his ability exhausted all "diplomatic" methods and now start searching for other more visually engaged methods.
After some time Person A goes to prison (for whatever crime) for rehabilitation? This with the fact that person A might now have access to better resources than before. Clean clothes etc...
And so, a prison/jail being a "deterrent" and place of "rehabilitation" comes into question. After all, why not rehabilitate and support the individual? Why not be proactive and how come that teacher shunning a normal(individual who is seeking acceptance from peers)is not behind bars?
Surely giving organic support where needed is not a bad thing... So why is it so rare? Fear of "Parents or Guardians" not approving?
Yet when we hear of a cancer patient, we tend to neglect the local orphanage... Yes,orphans need much more than money. They need support and acceptance from their peers(just like you and me) which can not be bought or bribed...
But a token of acknowledgment in some form of comfort is welcome. Not to mention being vaccinated...
Conclusion and extra thoughts
We need to think further about our actions and be not so easily sidetracked.(I'm pretty sure I'm not the one that said it first,moving on...)
People are ruled by leaders,beliefs and not voting...
We need a new way to go about things and stop obsessing. It does not do a whole lot of good with 0% regulation on building or bridges, does it? Over regulation , kills businesses with new vivid ideas. Listening to those who are not your intellectual equivalent tell you the idea is "to-good-to-be-true" is madness. Part of the reason why we seldom have nice things like Bitcoin or Steemit.
Are we truly that afraid to connect the dots?
