Thanks for the feedback. I followed up on the original article discussion, but want to get more into editorial perspective here. I'm interested in promoting posts that make an interesting claim, attempt to back up that claim, and show potential for discussion. Based in the amount of back and forth on that thread, is successful in those respects.
If I've made a mistake and included a post so low in quality it should not have been mentioned at all, I definitely want to be called out on it. Also, if I missed a post from today that is higher quality (using criteria above ) that should have been included, let me know about that as well.
Either way, I appreciate you taking time to voice your opinion.
RE: The #philosophy Review 12.6.2016