What would happen if the need for the most fundamental things of the human being was not known?
It would be the most essential limitation that could be experienced by a change in our universal orders, those that govern our wise nature. If we do not know the reason for everything that exists and has a meaning in the time and space nearby, then it is necessary to alter the possibilities of our environment, for this we must place a condition in which what exists probably exceeds the inertia so that something happen or else stay inert to never happen.
It is a way of throwing the luck by the infinite horizon of the possibilities, where the question of what happens must prevail over everything denied to satisfy the reason. Who seeks the reason must be without absolute rest where he is forced to admit the actions of getting a resounding change in the investigation of what he does not know, so the evidence of his effort, makes him and his environment to admit the facts of that reason so longed for.
We can not deny or hide something as great as the supreme thing that follows the path of morality, accept our facts about the changes of a reason that does not follow the pattern of our thoughts, it is a way of looking for the exact reproach that we would have to to make the most universal human reason existing in all that in which a universal law with practical characteristics can not be conceived where it reigns that absolute necessity of wanting to do everything to find the universal path of reason.
***"It is in this way, where reason does not allow the unconditioned practical necessity of the moral mandate, but what it allows is its most negative and absolute form of not finding reason, everything perceived and demonstrated in equality is proven, it is due to this, a practical philosophy must be demanded that transcends the limits of human reasoning up to the principles and human values that make us live in the most just society possible ". ***
