I find these kinds of posts really hard to... fathom.
Its kinda like having studied "economics" for years in school, and then finding out that it was Keynesian economics, and there are several other schools of economic theory. When you again read a post that is based on ..."expanding" (keynesian) economics you just have to shake your head.
There are entire mental practices for enhancing and strengthening intuition. Entire libraries on where and what intuition is and where it comes from. (investigate muses) There are entire catalogs of higher senses.
But, the one thing intuition can't deal with is rigorous scientific analysis. Intuition is an open/expansive/collective thing. Being forced into a closed environment where they try to break everything down is the undoing of intuition. So, while science is so focused on breaking everything down to understand it (that is actually what science means- scythe - to cut) intuition will eternally be elusive. And most scientists say that is proof that intuition isn't real.
Kinda like carrying a candle around trying to find some dark. Or keeping your eyes covered while seeking for some light.
RE: Intuitive Knowledge vs Knowledge Based on Reason