Sadly, John Perry Barlow, the founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation has died today. He was - to me - a huge inspiration for the internet anarchy and the cyberlibertarian movement I support.
As a tribute, I would like to provide a dissection of his speech on The Right To Know at TEDx.
The first time Barlow got online, he thought the internet would create the collective organism of mind.
He believed that one day everyone on the planet would be endowed with the right to say whatever they want to say within their hearts, and nobody would be in the position to shut them up. In addition, everybody would have the right to not listen to what was said or written on the internet.
The internet was going to be the great challenger of dogmatism.
Having founded the Electronic Frontier Foundation in July 1990, he spent many years thinking about the intersection between Cyberspace and the physical world.
All the existing power relations in the physical are being renegotiated in Cyberspace.
We are now at the point where the physical world is starting to become terrified of Cyberspace. This is obviously shown by how governments deal with Wikileaks and the Arab awakening.
Cyberspace has provided the bloggers, and journalists of Wikileaks and the Arab awakening with the opportunity to question the political structure. They knew that their real power was the ability to speak, and to be heard.
They also understood that they had the right to know.
If we play our cards right, the internet will make it possible for everybody on the internet to satisfy his curiosity to the fullest extent that is presently known by our species. Everyone interested, can know what is presently known.
Nothing like this has had ever happened before.
To achieve that, we have to realize that we cannot own free speech.
Copyright is the wrong model for monetizing the expression of the mind. Thought is not a thing, ... it is an action. The more a thought is heard and understood, the more powerful it becomes. It's not like physical goods.
Because of the old model of thinking of expression as a thing that must be regulated towards scarcity, there are many things going on right now that are militating against Freedom of expression.
Comcast, yesterday, stopped all of our access to PirateBay. PirateBay is a notorious copyright infringement site, but is also an important cause with different members from European parliaments.
The other thing is that tolerance is a right of that person you find most intolerable. Freedom of expression is the defense of that right.
The answer to hate speech is love speech, and the answer of the speech you can't stand is the speech of your own heart. So you have to go out there and defend those bastards, and you have to go out there and stop those who will try to own Freedom of expression.
Take a look at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
If you enjoy reading this article, please consider following me. I mainly write about philosophy, economics, and my travels.
