Right. There's certainly nothing wrong with deductive reasoning, and there can't even be inductive science without deductive reasoning. But any deduction involves two things: valid premises and a presumption that you can tell right from wrong somehow. Not onlyTzortzis premises are BS, but relying on human intuitions to understand the ontological nature of something transcendent... it's ridiculous.

Fixed a small error: "there can't be inductive science withOUT deductive reasoning."