Not true. Considering the ubiquity of portable cameras today, not everyone is a "selfie freak". Some people (and I argue here that it's loads of them) possess the uncanny ability to stifle their narcissistic impulses. The rest, do abuse the opportunity given - they are truly show-offs. OP's point is valid.

nah. everybody takes selfies and tries to appear good. clothes do the same job. cars, names on the spike of a book. we are all narcissistic mate.

Not true. Considering the ubiquity of portable cameras today, not everyone is a "selfie freak". Some people (and I argue here that it's loads of them) possess the uncanny ability to stifle their narcissistic impulses. The rest, do abuse the opportunity given - they are truly show-offs. OP's point is valid.

unless you are alexander with another profile, this is an old discussion and you are completely off.

You are not arguing on point. It seems that all you are trying to do is discredit the OP for whichever personal reason or gain. The OP is plainly saying "what's the use of a toned, honed, muscular body if it cannot be "compared" with it's polar opposite?" I will not argue here whether this is true or false but I will heed you with this: Be contemplatively fair and mind your language.

everything can be compared and you don't need philosophy but rather economics to speculate what is useful and what is not. you don't need a "theory". the OP is obsessed with "discovering" new "theories" for some fuck up reason and most of the times he regresses to simple realisations about life but spins them around in order to label them as "his theory".

and who the fuck made you a cheerleader anyways?