Putting the problem: The goal of man is to search for the truth of what is surrounding him and his truth. It is not easy to access this fact and may not reach it for this situation, they simplified a set of rules and divided into the induction and visual speech. The visual logic is known as a set of rules that prevent the idea of error in the search for the truth The extrapolation is known as the metaphorical approach that Based on experience as a measure of the health of issues. It is considered that Aristotle that the application of thought with himself in the visual logic is the one that guarantees us agreement minds about the truth that reaches it while the school sees modern experimentation that the application of thought with reality in the extrapolation is what leads to the truth that agree about Minds. Do you agree minds about the scientific truth offered us the mind in formal logic that? Or does induction alone guarantee us access to the truth that conforms around the minds?
The attempt to solve the problem: the presentation of the thesis (the application of thought with itself is a guarantee for the 'agreement of minds) adopted in the visual logic on our mind contains the principles called principles of the mind helps him to analysis and synthesis and conclusion, the most important principle of identity and the common mind among all Human beings are up to the knowledge that everyone agrees.
The development of Aristotelian logic based on the static mind, which is considered to be the control of the argument: a common instinct common to humans consists of innate principles, the principle of identity which is divided into the principle of non-contradiction and the third raised and considered this principle sufficient to agree minds about the validity or error of knowledge At the same time and from the same side as saying (Ahmed is in the section and in the arena at the same time and the same side) All of our minds agree that this knowledge is wrong because the mind does not accept to contain the opposite. What the principle of non-identity contained was true and our minds agreed on its validity. Therefore, the application of thought with oneself is the only way to reach the right knowledge where the minds agree.
Out of argument: the agreement of thought with itself and adoption of the principle of reason and reliance on the mind is still static knowledge while our knowledge is directed to the outside world, which is characterized by permanent movement as we derive facts from reality and the principles of reason unable to devise this we need another approach.
Although it is Aristotle who created the extrapolation, he regarded it as a source of knowledge, ie, its consequences were questionable. The value of Francis Pico Luh was valued by John Stuart Mill in the 18th century.
John Stuart Mill drew sharp criticism of the logic of Aristotle because there is no argument: it has innate principles to help him in knowledge, but experience is that we have reached the truth behind the physical phenomena of this do not rely on the still but the moving mind that Leland calls mind with which the cognitive knowledge occurs after Experience is its own tools because it is based on empirical evidence. Science that is not subject to experience is not a valid science.
Descartes believes that extrapolation has helped scientists reduce this vast number of natural phenomena in a simple set of physical laws because it is based on the principle of causality and the principle of determinism to which nature is subject, making inductive knowledge valid and in agreement with minds.
Criticism of the argument: Although the extrapolation provided advanced technological results on the measurement of Aristotle, but in the end did not lead the agreement of the minds and did not achieve what was not possible visual logic, where the criticism of the scientists themselves to me extrapolation assured the ability to compromise the minds.
Although the visual logic seems rigid in its image, although the extrapolation seems to be closer to the truth than the reliance on reality and experience, scientists have found that the application of thought with itself is closer to health than the stability because natural phenomena are variable and in a permanent movement and The free material itself changes and this change is hidden from us and can not be reached by the senses and not by scientific means but by the conclusion of the mind as is the solution in the case of global warming and the ozone hole This was Einstein's physics closer to the truth of Newton's real physics based on experimental induction while Einstein's physics is a Aina mental extrapolation of the facts of this was more honest.
In this way, the contemporary epistemology considered that the rule that ended the value of empirical extrapolation in favor of the image matrix, which in turn was lost to its value in the face of logic The athlete who achieved what he can not visual logic and induction where the minds agree minds are only partially in the logic of the picture and often opposed to the extrapolation, but in mathematics agrees exactly in the minds of this succeeded Einstein, Newton failed to what was based on the geometry Spherical to t Yaman.