For someone undevoted you seem triggered enough to be part of the conversation here, read, reread and think on ways to create a valid argument against my points.

You have also run under an assumption that 'I am' down on philosophers who devote their lives to it. Whoa, that is a big assumption, is it not? Do you base your words on a few lines in one article or on my actions day to day?

I am not saying you are wrong but how do you know you are right?

Regardless of how good the tools of reason we have available are, we all work under unreasonable assumptions and speak and act accordingly.

Being part of the conversation to remove some of the personal assumptions should not be limited to a few. Peehaps if more people feel connected and empowered enough to their experience, they will take agency and truly immerse themselves into an active role in their own lives.

One can acquire a lot through the words of others. Knowing and doing are quite different.

Thanks for taking part.