You base your arguments on socio-liberal fallacies, only defending dogmatic foundations that from empiricism or even rationalism have nothing. There is a lack of facts, you build your opinions only with emotional reasoning and censorship on the facts which are not convenient to fulfil your progressive political agenda.

You fear the possibility of experiencing a metanoia of ideas, then you shelter yourself in the liberal dogmas that hide the reality of human nature and the biology of our ecosystem. All this because it's easier, it's easier to be labelled as a protector of the universal interests, to be the illuminated emotional "good person", to be known as the one who thinks and respects "everyone", since you aren't doing what you preach in the first place, when ignoring facts that can, in fact, improve everyone's lives and every society on the globe.