nah. everybody takes selfies and tries to appear good. clothes do the same job. cars, names on the spike of a book. we are all narcissistic mate.

An absolutist, extremist naysayer. You will do exceptionally well on any discussion panel.

unless you are alexander with another profile, this is an old discussion and you are completely off.

Looks like you pasted the wrong lines of text. Correct yourself and enlighten me further if you please. Postscript - I Am that I Am.

everything can be compared and you don't need philosophy but rather economics to speculate what is useful and what is not. you don't need a "theory". the OP is obsessed with "discovering" new "theories" for some fuck up reason and most of the times he regresses to simple realisations about life but spins them around in order to label them as "his theory".

According to "The Artist (once) formerly known as Prince" nothing compares to U(se) so we definitely know that at least one high ranking official who disagrees with your statement. Economics might dictate whatever is engineered to be pushed outwardly as a trend (which is what i believe the OP was pointing out) but you need a higher authority (i.e. philosophy) to analyse whether economics are useful or to utilise a better term beneficial (hint: they are not). I still insist and it's most evident here that you've got a beef with the OP so you better clear that (and your language) out.

and who the fuck made you a cheerleader anyways?

It's dead certain that it wasn't you bud.