He does not want to exchange photomicrography and microphotography, and that's fine, he was just pointing out that some dictionaries do. Let's accept that bellows and tubes are not for microscopes now. Are you saying that increases larger than 1: 1 are not macros, but photomicrographs? If so, I think that's what we're going to do. If you are photographing with a march (not a microscope) of a subject that you can see with the naked eye, you are still making a macro photograph.
Also, if you go back and shoot with less magnification than 1: 1 or with a macro lens, or choose a telephoto lens, and fill the frame with the subject, that's close-up photography. Let's do it with photography! For me, this is a macro photograph, we can still see the head of a fly with our eyes. Are you saying that this is a photomicrography? Its magnification is greater than 1: 1 even though it was taken with a macro lens but in a body cut out of the sensor.