Hi!

A couple days ago I attached my Super Carenar MC f=135mm 1:2.8, an over four decades old manual vintage lens on the nose of my camera, and went for a shoot.

^{A view from the Mukkula Mansion, over the lake Vesijärvi
1/500s F8 Dual-ISO 100+200}

^{The Mukkula pier
1/500s F8 Dual-ISO 100+200}

On Friday, while I was waiting for Leo to finish school, I took the camera to Myllysaari, and shot more photos with the same lens.

^{Branch
1/800s F4 Dual-ISO 100+200}

^{An island in the distance
1/320s F8 Dual-ISO 100+200}

^{Same island, and a bit of a cape on the left.
1/320s F8 Dual-ISO 100+200}

I thought I was getting a bit underexposed images, and as I went to a shade, I decided to really overdo with the exposure, but I still got a bit underexposed results. (Mind you they all looked pretty nice in the camera screen, but when I imported them to darktable, the truth was all but the last photos were massively underexposed.)

Anyhow, F2.8 seemed to give me somewhat decent results. I just think it is a bit too narrow field of depth, and I the lens does create some chromatic aberrations.

^{Details
1/200s F2.8 Dual-ISO 100+200}