Well, the beauty of my theory, unlike most models of zero points/ether and so forth, is that there is a simple way to test it. Make a machine that generates the chaotic electron patterns. There already is a rudimentary device which does this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RF_resonant_cavity_thruster
My current working idea is to replace the microwave magnetron with a tesla coil tuned to produce extremely high frequency, low amperage current, and emit this into a resonant cavity that has been coated with Pyrolytic Carbon:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolytic_carbon
The resonant chamber where the emitter coil is located, is shaped such that it causes a second harmonic resonance. The EM field is trapped inside this chamber, and will not ground within it, and the EM waves will bounce back and forth between a 1:2 ratio pear-shaped cavity, every time passing through the aperture into the small cavity, causing a resonance effect, cutting the wavelength in half. Once the waves pass back through this enough times, the minimum size for an EM fluctuation will be reached, and it will escape through the emitter hole at the top, opposite the half sized resonant sub-cavity.
If it works as per my theory, then just as the situation with an explosive, with its intensely violent electron re-arrangement (so violent it releases incredible amounts of heat), electrons will form 'bubbles' that repulse in all directions, and through the tiny hole, they will generate the equal-and-opposite linear acceleration. Except this device will not generate any significant amount of heat.
The other device that I have in mind uses an array of electromagnetic coils, arranged in the geometry of a pentagram. The pentagram has, in its' 3d form, the shape of a spiral, if you place its star-shaped center arms such that they go down from one side to the other. My theory is that some arrangement of components in this geometry will cause the capture of electromagnetic flux, and drive it into an orbital pattern, creating a rotating summative magnetic field. In other words, taking that radial anisotropy, and pushing it through a twist. If this model is correct, it should be possible to directly capture, and perhaps even measure, the force of this proposed "Electron Fog". As well as having a nearly limitless amount of electric potential energy to tap off and apply to work.
There might be other ways to positively determine the existence of the radial anisotropic pattern, such as polarisers of some kind (Maybe more of this diamagnetic, pyrolytic carbon involved). It should be possible to sense this geometry of electron movement, with a sufficiently long and wide array.
What put me onto the idea was the thought about explosive exothermic chemical reactions, such as jet fuel, or even an optimised mix of octane and oxygen. Chemical equilibrium dictates that a given chemical change from one nano/molecular arrangement of components, into another, requires a minimum heat level. The heat causes the atoms to be pushed apart from each other, and when the threshold is reached, the electrons do this little dance, and voila you have a new mixture of chemicals in your flask.
Explosives do the same thing, except the threshold is relatively low, and the reaction itself releases a lot of heat, causing a chain reaction.
So, you know, if you understood this description of chemical reactions, that one of the things you can do with chemicals is you can put electrons in, and drive photons out (as in, all electrical light devices). You can put in heat, and get out light (burning carbon, hydrogen, etc), and you can put in heat, and get out electricity, as well. Does it not make sense therefore, that all photons get trapped in certain kinds of atomic structures, which are held together by electrons.
Second data point, is the fact that transmission of mechanical force through magnetic fields is nearly 100% efficient. This is partly why, thermodynamically, you can get away with doing transformations into electricity, storing in batteries, and then putting the torque out with an electric motor. You can take the torque, rotational acceleration, from a combustion engine, turn it into electricity using a generator, then back to torque in a motor at, I am not sure of the figure exactly, but as measured in terms of torque, it is less than 15% loss, and I am probably being conservative.
So, when it comes to mechanical force, electrons, and magnetic fields, are the most efficient known methods of transmitting it.
So what is gravity, if it is not mechanical potential energy? The hydrological cycle works by heat causing the density of water, which has very strong bonds between molecules (highest latent heat capacity of all known materials), to drop dramatically, and form water vapor. This vapor floats up, hits a cold body of atmosphere, condenses, and falls back down. So it seems like the heat is driving this, and yes, it is, but the heat simply is breaking the magnetic attraction between Oxygen and Hydrogen in the water. From this one simple cycle, billions of gigavolts of power have been generated. Water rises, falls on a mountain, and flows down, and using a turbine attached to a generator, you get power.
Something, that interacts with electrons, causes something that has moved away from the centre of gravity, to acquire massive amounts of energy. When the matter falls down, it releases this energy as mechanical energy.
There has to be a mechanism for this, and I am proposing that it is this radial anisotropy. A very very weak electromagnetic alignment that contracts as you move towards the centre of mass. Mass, and thus mechanical power, is thus caused by electrons flowing in orbits smaller than the diameters of atoms.
Well, anyway, you can plainly see that the geometric pattern fits the model. The only premise you have to accept is that the electrons push matter together, because space itself is expanding. This creates an equilibrium like that of surface tension. The matter converges by this apparent gravitational effect, because it optimises the anisotropy from the bubble, like between two opposite poles of a magnet, to a single, stable radial pattern centred on the gravity center.
The idea of space expanding is where I originally got these ideas. I just never realised that it could be a massive quantity of electrons flowing, chaotically, but in a centre-seeking path. If this is correct, then there will be some way to directly interact with it.
I hope that someday I can build machines to test the hypothesis, because to solve the puzzle of the origin of gravitational potential energy, would be a revolution, in economics. The cost of rearranging the materials in the marketplace would drop nearly to zero. Far greater optimisation of resource utilisation would become possible.
RE: The Geometry of Gravity, and the Geometry of Linear Acceleration