Watch on VidMe: https://vid.me/PjZc
Download PDF Notes: https://1drv.ms/b/s!As32ynv0LoaIhuZ1SIKnqmBLDle0BQ
Download These Notes: https://mes.fm/pizzagate
Subscribe via Email: https://mes.fm/subscribe
Donate! ☺
- PayPal: https://mes.fm/donate
- Patreon: https://patreon.com/matheasysolutions
○ First person to donate (even just a dollar) gets a shoutout!
○ So far I have 0 patreons :(
NOTE: If you don't have to time to watch this whole video:
- Skip to the end for the summary and conclusions.
- Play this video at a faster speed.
Recap on Previous Parts
Parts 1, 4-10: Madeleine McCann Case / Podesta / Pedophilia Connections
Part 2, 3: ACORN Controversy
Part 7: Conspiracy Advice for Online Researchers.
Part 11: National Pizza Day Strange Coincidences
Part 12: FBI Document on Pedophilia Symbols and Logos
Part 13, 14: Mindset and Tactics of Pedophiles
ALL Parts: Media Cover-Up and/or Silence
#PizzaGate Part 15
Topics to Cover:
- PizzaGate Updates and Search Trends
- Kurt Eichenwald and Justin Berry
- Mainstream Media Coverage
PizzaGate Updates
YouTube Demonetization Again…
YouTube demonetizes videos deemed "not advertiser-friendly" so I have to be careful about the wording/images I use in my videos.
This is in fact nothing more than censorship, as I explain in my earlier video.
22 December 2016 by Math Easy Solutions (i.e. me)
YouTube Demonetization: "Controversial" News
I break down how YouTube's demonetization policy has nothing to do with "advertisers" and everything to do with censorship.
Please support my channel by watching/liking/commenting/sharing and if you can by donating to my Patreon/PayPal :)
Buzzfeed Calls for PizzaGate Censorship on YouTube… + Joseph Bernstein's Disgusting Hit Piece on David Seaman…
https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedNews/status/835373050170232832
- BuzzFeedNews
Absolutely disgusting…
Avoid Censorship by BOOKMARKING!
Bookmarking sites is the best way to avoid any censorship that hides content from subscribers, newsfeeds, timelines, and even trending lists.
Also can group different types of content, and open many at once to get a better overview.
Avoid Censorship by SUBSCRIBING VIA EMAIL!
Subscribing via email also avoids censorship, and is the best way to get up-to-date information, especially being notified of any censorship.
CNN Leaks!!
Redirected: http://veritaslive.com/02-23-2017/project-veritas-releases-over-100-hours-of-audio-from-inside-cnn.html
23 February 2017 by Project Veritas
Project Veritas Releases Over 100 Hours of Audio From Inside CNN
James O'Keefe Offers $10,000 Award for Content Which Exposes Media Malfeasance
Anonymous Source Within CNN Provided Audio to Project Veritas
More Audio Yet to be Released in a WikiLeaks Style Dump
Project Veritas released 119 hours of raw audio in a WikiLeaks style dump, with over 100 more hours still yet to be released [released today I believe]. The audio was secretly recorded in 2009 by an anonymous source inside CNN's Atlanta headquarters who we are identifying as Miss X. The tapes contain soundbites from current and previous CNN employees Joe Sterling, Arthur Brice, and Nicky Robertson, as well as numerous others. Project Veritas is also offering a $10,000 award for content that exposes media malfeasance. The tapes show CNN's misrepresentation of polling data…
BLATANT Twitter Censorship of # CNNLeaks
https://twitter.com/search?q=cnnleaks%20censorship&src=typd
Archive: http://archive.is/GrFnY
Retrieved: 23 February 2017
John Podesta talks about #PizzaGate in an interview…
20 February 2017 by NewCo
John Podesta Talks About a Hacked Election
The Chair of Hillary Clinton’s campaign and former Chief of Staff to Bill Clinton joined John Heilemann for a candid conversation about “The Hacked Election.” His commentary is not to be missed.
This is one of the most bizarre interviews that I have ever seen…
John Podesta blames Russian "hackers" and "fake news" for Hillary's loss and praises corporations such as Facebook and Google for putting in place new censorship measures…
When asked about #PizzaGate he keeps saying Mainstream Media "debunked" it, and avoids any further questions from the interviewer…
For anyone that had doubts about Podesta, his interview may just have removed all doubts…
For more commentary on the interview, please check out: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1666838
Lynn Rothschild calls out John Podesta!!
https://twitter.com/LdeRothschild/status/834293947690262528
- LdeRothschild
Archive: https://archive.is/jobfy
Trump Holds Meeting on Stopping Human Trafficking
23 February 2017 by Based Patriot
President Trump Holds Anti-Human Trafficking Meeting 2/23/17
Soon 🍕
John Podesta gets a Column at The Washington Post… YOU SERIOUSLY CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP…
23 February 2017 by WashPostPR
John Podesta joins The Washington Post as a contributing columnist
The Washington Post today announced that John Podesta will join the Opinion section as a contributing columnist. Podesta, former chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign, will provide commentary and analysis on the intersection of politics and policy, the Trump administration and the future of the Democratic Party.
“No one knows more about how Washington works, how the White House operates, and how policy ideas are translated into reality than John Podesta,” said Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt. “His long experience in Congress, inside two Democratic White Houses and on the front lines of numerous presidential campaigns, will offer readers vital insight into Washington and politics at the start of a new era.”
Instead of asking Podesta about his obsession with pizza and hotdogs, he gets a column at WaPo….
Even besides #PizzaGate, WaPo is not even trying to hide their bias…
CNN / NY Times / Politico Barred from White House Press Briefing!!
https://twitter.com/MathEasySolns/status/835238097428201472
- MathEasySolns
PizzaGate Google Search Trends (As of 25 February 2017)
https://trends.google.ca/trends/explore?date=today%203-m&q=pizzagate,fake%20news
https://trends.google.ca/trends/explore?date=today%2012-m&q=pizzagate,fake%20news,spirit%20cooking
Kurt Eichenwald & Justin Berry
In #PizzaGate 13 and 14, I went over Kurt Eichenwald's 2005 investigation into the hidden world of pedophilia.
His investigative work was extremely insightful and helps bring to light the pedophile mindset as well as the tactics they use to manipulate and exploit kids, so make sure to watch those videos!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Eichenwald
Retrieved: 20 February 2017
Kurt Eichenwald
Kurt Alexander Eichenwald (born June 28, 1961) is an American journalist who serves as a senior writer with Newsweek, a contributing editor with Vanity Fair and a New York Times bestselling author of four books, one of which, The Informant (2000), was made into a motion picture in 2009. He was formerly a writer and investigative reporter with The New York Times and later with Condé Nast's business magazine, Portfolio. Eichenwald had been employed by The New York Times since 1986 and primarily covered Wall Street and corporate topics such as insider trading, accounting scandals, and takeovers, but also wrote about a range of issues including terrorism, the Bill Clinton pardon controversy, Federal health care policy, and sexual predators on the Internet.
…
In 2005, he wrote a group of New York Times articles about online child pornography. One of those articles was about Justin Berry, a then-18 year old who operated pornographic websites featuring himself and other teen males.[6][7] For this reporting, he received the Payne Award for Ethics in Journalism, for "preserving the editorial integrity of an important story while reaching out to assist his source, Justin Berry, in reporting on Berry’s involvement in child pornography."[8] He was also later criticized when it came to light that he had given Berry an undisclosed $2,000 before writing the articles.[9][10]
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/20/business/20kurtbox.html
20 August 2006 by Kurt Eichenwald
Editors’ Note
A New York Times investigation last year disclosed a new frontier in child pornography, in which minors used computer video Webcams to perform on the Internet in exchange for gifts and money. That article, published in December, resulted in a government crackdown, including arrests and the shutdown of major Webcam pornography sites.
The Times’s investigation opened a window into an online subculture of pedophiles. This two-part series is a further look into that world and the businesses that have developed to serve it.
Covering this story raised legal issues. United States law makes it a crime to purchase, download or view child pornography, unless the images are promptly reported to authorities and no images are copied or retained. The Times complied with the law, disclosing what it found to appropriate authorities.
https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/1194817121758/interview-with-justin-berry.html
16 December 2005 by TimesVideo
Interview with Justin Berry
Justin Berry explains to Kurt Eichenwald how he obtained his first webcam. (Producer: David Rummel)
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/19/us/through-his-webcam-a-boy-joins-a-sordid-online-world.html
19 December 2005 by Kurt Eichenwald
Through His Webcam, a Boy Joins a Sordid Online World
…
Editors' Note: March 6, 2007, Tuesday An article by Kurt Eichenwald on Dec. 19, 2005, reported on a teenage boy's sexual exploitation on the Internet, and an accompanying Reporter's Essay by Mr. Eichenwald published on nytimes.com explained the details of his initial contact with the subject.
The essay was intended to describe how Mr. Eichenwald persuaded Justin Berry, then 18, to talk about his situation. But Mr. Eichenwald did not disclose to his editors or readers that he had sent Mr. Berry a $2,000 check. Mr. Eichenwald said he was trying to maintain contact out of concern for a young man in danger, and did not consider himself to be acting as a journalist when he sent the check.
Mr. Eichenwald explained in his essay that, at the outset, he did not identify himself to Mr. Berry as a reporter. After they met in person, but before he decided that he wanted to write an article, Mr. Eichenwald said he told the youth that the money would have to be returned. Times policy forbids paying the subjects of articles for information or interviews. A member of Mr. Berry's family helped repay the $2,000.
The check emerged as part of a criminal proceeding involving Mr. Berry in which a Michigan man is charged with criminal sexual conduct, enticing a minor to commit immoral acts and distributing child pornography. The trial began yesterday.
The check should have been disclosed to editors and readers, like the other actions on the youth's behalf that Mr. Eichenwald, who left The Times last fall, described in his article and essay.
19 December 2005 by Kurt Eichenwald
REPORTER'S ESSAY: Making a Connection With Justin
Editor's Note Appended
My reporting on Webcam pornography began inadvertently last May, when an online search for financial fraud cases led to an odd posting describing what was said to be an international criminal investigation of a group of Web companies.
Searching for clues about that inquiry took me on a trail to other sites and posted messages. Eventually, I came across entries about someone named Justin, who, based on what I read, seemed to be an adult pornography star. Perplexed about how he was linked to a fraud case, I searched further at archive.org, which keeps copies of old Web sites, and discovered a photograph of a boy who appeared to be about 14 years old.
This, supposedly, was Justin - not an adult, but a child.
The original posting about the investigation proved to be a fake, and the more postings I read about Justin, including hundreds on a Yahoo message board set up by his fans, the more I came to suspect that his lurid story might also be an Internet fable. But I wanted to be sure.
Eventually, I found a lead: a screen name for Justin, which I could use to send him an instant message. My first attempts failed; Justin later said that he blocked these messages because the nature of my questions convinced him that I was with law enforcement.
The only way to know if Justin was real, I decided, was to meet him in person. And to do that, I had to win the confidence of whoever was answering to his screen name. At The Times, it is standard practice for a reporter to identify himself at the outset, but doing that too soon would mean I might never know the truth. I decided to try to engage this person in conversation and persuade him to meet with me. At that time, I would disclose my identity and only then would I begin the real reporting that could be used in an article.
I contacted Justin again; this time, I mimicked the tone of the members of the Yahoo site, simply identifying myself as a fan. From there began an off-and-on, online conversation that went on for weeks, mostly about the music that I write as a hobby; Justin assumed that that was my career, and I did not try hard to dissuade him.
Soon thereafter, I proposed meeting in Los Angeles, and Justin agreed. My wife, Theresa, whom I had kept abreast of what was happening, worried that this could be a setup, and made me promise to take precautions. I did, but when I saw Justin at the airport, I was reassured. Although he was 18, he looked much younger and did not seem physically capable of harming me.
I immediately identified myself as a Times reporter, and Justin, though taken aback, continued to speak to me; for more than an hour, we discussed my background, until he was willing to proceed. Over the next two days, I interviewed the person I now knew was Justin Berry. By then, I was aware that Justin was addicted to cocaine and marijuana. With no expectation that he would agree, I asked him to stop. I also urged Justin to quit responding to messages from his adult admirers. Justin agreed to both requests.
Today, he has a simple explanation for why he listened so readily. "I didn't want to die," he said. "The things I was involved in were horrible, but I could never find a way out. I wanted for it all to end so badly, so I was ready to do anything."
Days after the initial meeting, Justin called, sounding terribly upset. A man was visiting him who, I believed from our interview, had molested Justin in the past and had provided him drugs to keep him compliant. Given the situation, Times editors agreed to fly Justin from Bakersfield, Calif., to Dallas, where I could interview him while he worked through his drug withdrawal.
After arriving, Justin angrily told of molestations at the hands of multiple men since he was a young teenager. He took me inside his online world, showing corners of the Internet where predators spoke among themselves.
Justin's physical condition was weak, and with the approval of my editors I introduced him to a doctor. He was suffering both from malnutrition and a mild venereal disease. His eardrums were irreparably damaged from years of untreated infections. Scars, from what appeared to be a whipping, were found on his back, although Justin could not remember who or what caused them.
Withdrawal - coupled with the trauma of recounting his experiences - worsened his emotional state. Justin often became terrified in public places, convinced that men he saw might be either members of his site or people working with his former business partners. He would burst unexpectedly into tears. At my suggestion, Justin agreed to seek counseling.
As his emotional and physical health improved, Justin said he would fully cooperate with a story about self-generated child pornography on the Internet, allowing The Times to print his name. My editors and I decided to delay accepting his offer, however, until we were certain that Justin was competent to make the decision, something that would only be accomplished if he continued his recovery from drugs.
Justin disclosed the names of other children at risk, and told of a trove of evidence about his online pornography business: computer hard drives, kept at his mother's home in California, that contained years of financial data, including records of client payment, saved online conversations and other information.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/20/business/20model.html
20 August 2006 by Kurt Eichenwald
With Child Sex Sites on the Run, Nearly Nude Photos Hit the Web [Part 1 of 2]
In the photograph, the model is shown rising out of a bubble bath, suds dripping from her body. Her tight panties and skimpy top are soaked and revealing. She gazes at the viewer, her face showing a wisp of a smile that seems to have been coaxed from off-camera.
…
The model’s online name is Sparkle. She is — at most — 9 years old.
…
Extremely bizarre description of a child…
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/opinion/25pubed.html
25 March 2007 by Byron Calame
Money, a Source and New Questions About a Story
CONTROVERSY is again swirling around The Times’s 2005 article about 18-year-old Justin Berry and the Web world of child pornography, where the reporter Kurt Eichenwald discovered him and younger boys under the sway of predatory adults.
Mr. Eichenwald’s unusual reporting tactics, which included convincing Mr. Berry to leave that world, swear off drugs and cooperate with a federal investigation of child pornography, had raised questions of journalistic ethics. Might the personal relationship, for example, have caused Mr. Eichenwald to sugarcoat Mr. Berry’s actions in his Dec. 19 article?
…
But earlier this month, a copy of a $2,000 cashier’s check sent by Mr. Eichenwald to Mr. Berry in June 2005 turned up in the trial of a Michigan man charged with criminal sexual conduct. That sparked a loosely worded Editors’ Note in The Times on March 6 and a new round of questions about the integrity of the reporting. The note said that although the $2,000 was later repaid by Mr. Berry’s family, the original payment should have been disclosed to editors, but was not.
Mr. Eichenwald, who went to work for Condé Nast’s new business magazine, Portfolio, in September, quickly defended himself in a rambling 2,600-word post on Romenesko, a journalism Web site. His basic point: He sent the check as a private citizen in an effort to locate and help Mr. Berry, and demanded repayment when he decided the next month that there was a story to be reported as a journalist.
“I should have told my editors,” Mr. Eichenwald wrote of the $2,000 transaction, which he said had simply slipped his mind. “Once the reporting began ... a financial transaction from a month before ... just slipped away amid the 18 hour days, seven days a week of turmoil and chaos.”
…
The Editors’ Note also muddied the picture a bit. It had Mr. Eichenwald saying he had asked Mr. Berry to return the money “after they met in person, but before he decided that he wanted to write an article.” Given that the two first met in Los Angeles on June 30, 2005, the Editors’ Note would appear to contradict the Dec. 19 first-person essay, which began, “My reporting on Webcam pornography began inadvertently last May.”
The public editor serves as the readers' representative. His opinions and conclusions are his own. His column appears at least twice monthly in this section.
http://www.freecasey.com/about/
About "Casey" (Timothy Ryan Richards)
…Just 10 days after convincing Casey to help him with his "adult site", Justin disappeared, leaving Casey holding the site and all its contents. Casey later learned that it was Justin's plan all along to leave Casey in control. Justin had secretly filmed and uploaded videos and pictures of himself with a 14 year old boy, then ran to the federal government seeking immunity for his crime.
With the assistance of his friend Kurt Eichenwald, from the New York Times, Justin was introduced to the potential of winning a $500,000 book and movie deal on his life as a porn star. As his first publicity stunt Justin planned to upload child pornography and have all his business partners and members arrested while he enjoyed the profits, fame, and fortune.
As crazy as the story sounds, it worked! Under pressure from the New York Times, the federal government granted Justin immunity and arrested the unknowing Casey who was stuck holding the bag on Justin's crime.
After Casey's arrest he was pressured by the federal government to assist in the arrest of other unknowing homosexuals who were caught in Justin's plan. He was told to either help out or face an extreme punishment. Not being willing to send innocent people to jail, Casey resisted. As a result of his efforts he has been placed in federal prison for crimes he did not commit.
His fight is still underway today, this website is dedicated to his fight for justice against the largest superpower in the world.
http://www.freecasey.com/about/transcripts.php
Transcripts: Kurt Eichenwald and Justin Berry Related Documents
List of available court documents.
http://www.freecasey.com/about/pacer.php
Pacer Documents: History
3:05-cr-00185 USA v. Richards
Aleta A. Trauger, presiding
List of even more court documents.
http://www.freecasey.com/about/transcripts/DE278.pdf
8 August 2007 by Timothy S. Perkins
Re: Our File No. E0380-003; United States of America v. Timothy Ryan Richards; Case No. 3:05-00185; In the United States District Court, Middle District of Tennessee
Page 7
Page 8
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/08/business/media/08paper.html
8 August 2007 by Richard Perez-Pena
Court Papers Said to Show Added Payments by Reporter
A former New York Times reporter who wrote an article in late 2005 about a teenager who operated a pornographic Web site may have sent more money to the young man than he had previously acknowledged, according to people familiar with sealed documents filed with a court in Tennessee.
The reporter, Kurt Eichenwald, acknowledged this year that on June 8, 2005, he sent a $2,000 check to Justin Berry, the subject of that and later articles, but later demanded repayment and received it.
But several people involved in the court case say the sealed documents indicate that Mr. Eichenwald made at least $1,100 of additional payments in June 2005, some not in his own name, to a PayPal account controlled by Mr. Berry and another man who helped him operate his Web site. These people spoke on the condition of anonymity.
A judge in the United States District Court in Nashville ordered the documents sealed until some material is deleted.The Times, like most mainstream news organizations, prohibits paying sources for information, and it bars reporters and editors from having financial relationships of any kind with people or organizations that figure in their coverage.
…
“I have no independent memory of any payments I am alleged to have made in June 2005 through PayPal,” he said in a written statement yesterday. “If these PayPal payments did occur in June 2005, I am deeply sorry that my inability to remember them has resulted in permitting a series of convicted felons to cast doubt on the nature of my wife’s and my efforts to save a young man who was caught in the grip of a cycle of drugs and abuse.”
…
Lawrence Ingrassia, the business editor of The Times, said that when the $2,000 payment came to light this year, Mr. Eichenwald told him that there were no other payments to Mr. Berry, save for one payment of $10 made through a PayPal account.
The additional payments, also from June 2005, came to light through the case of Timothy R. Richards, who had helped run Mr. Berry’s Web site.
Mr. Richards was convicted on child pornography charges last October in United States District Court in Nashville and could face what amounts to a life sentence in prison. In an entry on his Web site in November 2006, he said that Mr. Berry was responsible for putting sexually explicit images of a minor on his Web site without Mr. Richards’s knowledge, then blamed Mr. Richards.
…
The subpoenas produced material that appears to show several instances of money sent by Mr. Eichenwald, sometimes under another name, to a PayPal account controlled by Mr. Berry and an older business partner, Greg Mitchel. Mr. Mitchel pleaded guilty to child pornography charges last year.
Stephen M. Ryan, Mr. Eichenwald’s lawyer, said Mr. Richards’s lawyers were “fishing for evidence concerning someone who didn’t testify in the case,” calling the tactic “bogus.”
…
http://www.freecasey.com/about/transcripts/DE251.pdf
Filed: 23 July 2007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIMOTHY RYAN RICHARDS
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THIRD PARTY’S MOTION TO QUASH AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
Page 7 to 9
In the course of the post-trial discovery review, Defendant Richards found information that an unidentified person, acting in concert with Justin Berry, assisted in the relaunch of the JustinsFriends site.9 Specifically, the defense located information showing that, as of at least May 5, 2005, someone using the email address, skywrite55@aol.com, was listed in Greg Mitchel’s AOL “buddies list.” On June 3, 2005, someone named “Andrew McDonald” accessed MexicoFriends.com (an old website operated by Berry) from an affiliate page (suspected of being a child pornography site) using IP address 65.68.206.29.
Then, between June 6, 2005 and June 23, 2005, “Andrew McDonald” using email address mostin2003@yahoo.com from IP addresses 65.68.206.29 and 66.140.63.145 transferred a series of PayPal payments to Greg@mitchelgroup.com. The payments totaled $1,184.00. A highlight of the troubling notes accompanying the payments from “Andrew McDonald” between June 6, 2005 and June 23, 2005 include:
• “i found a pretty good one...but the lighting sucks. washed out. still...worth 100.”
• “100. . .we gotta talk about what the really good ones are.”
• “so far...there are just 20 in the file, and most of them are nothing (shots of beds and driveways, or you rolling a joint.) that’s okay. i found 3 so far that i either didn’t already have and were good. the way i am judging them is this: if i save them, i pay for them. if i don’t - it means i didn’t even bother to finish looking at them, so i didn’t want to buy.”
• “a problem... i might have hit my withdrawl limit for today. this is funded by a debit card, and i withdrew a ton of cash this morning. it is not letting me send 25. i still owe you at least 65, which i will pay by morning. i will keep trying to do this.”
• “now paid 110...or 310 so far. and have only downloaded -or kept - two. so...im being nice.”
• “the ftp site is still not working...Paid a dollar to let you know. Now it doesn’t seem to work at all. Once it’s up and running, I’ll be back to downloading...and paying you. I’ll be online today. Find me and lemme know what to do. And I have other proposals for you that would get you even more money.”10
• “the problem with the ftp site is...when i try to go in it says ‘the folder ‘ftp.66.27.236.12/weee/’ is read only because the proxy server is not set up to allow full access. to move, paste, rename or delete files, you must use a different proxy, contact your system administrator.’ then, i click okay - and all it shows me is test_buddy.txt. no other files are there. Any thoughts?”
• “email me when you can...or tellme when u will be on aim. i haven’t had access to the ftp site since we last spoke. and i’d like to start payin ya again. email me at skywrite55@aol.com, or tell me when u will be on aim.”(underlining added for emphasis). The above referenced proxy server (‘ftp.66.27.236.12/weee/’) tracks back to Bakersfield, California (Berry’s place of residence).
[Footnote: 10 “Andrew McDonald” made this financial proposal on June 7, 2005.]
On June 17, 2005, two days before the relaunch of the JustinsFriends site, IP address 66.27.236.12 (presumably Berry) created a www.JustinsFriends.com account for someone named “Roy Rogers” with email address, skywrite55@aol.com (the same email address as that used by “Andrew McDonald”). The “Roy Rogers” user account was “administratively created” using Berry’s forensically unique, administrative account code.
On June 19, 2005, www.JustinsFriends.com was relaunched with new content and new advertising. (James Fottrell, TTR IV at 619).
From June 19, 2005 to June 30, 2005, IP address 66.140.63.145 (“Andrew McDonald”) made frequent, daily visits to the “quickstat” page for the JustinsFriends.com account on the NEOVA server. The “quickstat” page provides data regarding the usage and sign-ups for the site. Between June 23, 2005 and June 29, 2005, IP address 66.140.63.145 (“Andrew McDonald”) made at least 22 separate visits to the www.JustinsFriends.com website.
On July 3, 2005, IP address 68.88.131.187 (resolving to Dallas, Texas) passed through the affiliate “mylivewebcam/teencam” to JustinsFriends. The site www.mylivewebcam.com is a site where consumers would go to rate their favorite sites. Also on July 3, 2005, skywrite55@aol.com emailed Justin Berry at justinsfriendsinc@yahoo.com with a bizarre, personal message signed “Kurt.”11
On July 14, 2005, IP address 66.27.236.12 (presumably Berry12) administratively deleted the www.JustinsFriends.com user account for “Roy Rogers” with email address, skywrite55@aol.com (again, the same email address as that used by “Andrew McDonald”).
…
Page 22
Secondly, given the discoveries about the activities of Mr. Eichenwald (a.k.a. “Andrew
McDonald” and “Roy Rogers”) in the context of the relaunch of the JustinsFriends site and the production of the child pornographic “Taylor video,” there can be little serious doubt that the subpoenas were not issued frivolously or for purposes of harassment.
http://www.freecasey.com/images/dallasOnJF.pdf
Accesses Made to LA Server from Dallas TX
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
The court records clearly show that the IP Address 66.140.63.145, i.e. Kurt Eichenwald aka "Andrew McDonald", views the justinpreview2.wmv video MANY times…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Media_Video
Retrieved: 24 February 2017
Windows Media Video
Windows Media Video (WMV) is the name of a series of video codecs and their corresponding video coding formats developed by Microsoft.
http://www.freecasey.com/images/dallasOnNeova.pdf
http://www.freecasey.com/about/transcripts/DE284.pdf
6 August 2007 by Christian Lee
United States District Court Middle District of Tennessee: Declaration of Christian Lee
…
Page 3
…
Page 8
http://www.freecasey.com/about/pacer/DE366-1.pdf
Filed: 24 October 2008
In the United States district Court
Middle District of Tennessee
Nashville Division
United States of America v. Timothy Ryan Richards
Position of Defendant with Respect to Sentencing Factors
Page 26
As for Taylor, the probation office did not illicit a “victim impact statement” from him either. The record is abundantly clear that Taylor was truly Justin Berry’s victim. Taylor was a 14 year old who was paid to perform along side Berry in a mutual masturbation video. Richards played no role in the filming (production of the video), and he never interacted with Taylor.
…
Page 27
Specifically, during that year, Defendant Richards faced charges rooted in his involvement with the site and JustinsPreview2.wmv - a video advertisement montage containing partial footage from a child pornographic video (the “Taylor video”) produced by Justin Berry on June 9, 2005 (predating Richards’ involvement in the site).
Unfortunately, Berry seriously mislead the FBI and federal prosecutors about his own conduct and about the conduct of his co-conspirators in the early stages of the JustinsFriends site. He was immunized - a decision surely regretted by the government in hindsight.…
Page 28
[FOOTNOTE]11 It appears that Kurt Eichenwald has not been charged at this juncture for his conduct relating to the JustinsFriends site. Although it is abundantly clear (as the Court will recall from the Response to Eichenwald’s Motion to Quash), that Eichenwald was: (1) communicating with Mitchel by AOL instant messenger in May of 2005; (2) viewing old Berry content on MexicoFriends as of June 3, 2005; (3) making thousands of dollars in PayPal payments to Berry and Mitchel between June 6, 2005 and June 23, 2005 - with very disturbing messages attached; (4) making frequent visits (22 to be precise) to JustinsFriends.com between June 23, 2005 and June 29, 2005; (5) accessing membership sign-up and financial information about the revenue of JustinsFriends after the relaunch through administratively granted access from June 19, 2005 to June 30, 2005; and, (6) checking a ratings site for determining the popularity of JustinsFriends among competitors’ sites. These forensically verified computer events occurred in addition to any other payments or communications Eichenwald may have had with Justin Berry, Knute Berry or Greg Mitchel.
…
Page 28 to Page 29
The facts are now clear that, on June 8, 2005, Kurt Eichenwald purchased a Bank of America Cashier’s Check payable to Justin Berry in the amount of $2,000.00. Eichenwald sent the money to Berry via overnight delivery. Meanwhile, in the early morning hours of June 9, 2005, Justin Berry recruited and enticed a minor, Taylor, to perform in a mutual masturbation video with Berry. The video was filmed by Berry at Greg Mitchel’s home in Roanoke, Virginia using a web cam operated by Berry. Justin Berry was the hands-on perpetrator of that particular crime, although he was clearly operating in collaboration with his other coconspirators.12 After the completion of the child pornographic video, Berry and Mitchel went to Bank of America in Roanoke, Virginia to deposit Eichenwald’s check. Berry received $300 back in the deposit transaction, and Berry paid Taylor for his performance with those funds.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2007/03/the_check_went_to_the_male.html
8 March 2007 by Debbie Nathan
The Check Went to the Male
What does it look like when a Timesman buys a sex slave? Well, we don’t know, because we haven’t seen Nick Kristof’s Cambodian receipts. But we do know what it looks like when a Timesman lends someone out of prostitution. As part of the legal processes set in motion by Kurt Eichenwald’s December 2005 investigative series on online child porn, the $2,000 check he wrote to Justin Berry was subpoenaed. Here it is.
The check clearly has Kurt's name on it with the date June 8th, 2005, and combined with Kurt having admin privileges, Justin CLEARLY knew that the person he was communicating with was Kurt!
http://www.freecasey.com/about/transcripts/DE262.pdf
Page 1
…
Page 3
Court documents CLEARLY show that Kurt LIED in court about revealing his identity to Berry on June 30th…
http://www.freecasey.com/about/transcripts/DE251.pdf
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIMOTHY RYAN RICHARDS
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THIRD PARTY’S MOTION TO QUASH AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
Page 3 to 4
To that end, in the paper discovery, the government produced a June 8, 2005 Bank of America Cashier’s Check payable to Justin Berry in the amount of $2,000.00 with the name of the purchaser redacted.3 Noting the curious timing of the check transactions (June 8 and 9, 2005) given the fact that the Taylor video was filmed by Berry in the early morning hours of June 9, 2005, the defense was compelled to investigate the source of the funds - suspecting that the $2,000.00 payment may have represented an unidentified predator’s commissioning of the child pornographic video’s production. Contemplating whether this information could form part of a defense to the JustinsFriends counts (then, the entire Second Superseding Indictment) or, at a minimum, could yield other investigatory leads for the defense in preparing for trial, the defense issued a trial subpoena to Bank of America for the purpose of gathering full information about the $2,000 Cashier’s Check. On October 9, 2005, Bank of America responded to the subpena, indicating that the Cashier’s Check was purchased by Mr. Eichenwald at the Dallas, Texas branch in Preston Hills on June 8, 2005 and was deposited in part and cashed in part by Justin Berry in Roanoke, Virginia on June 9, 2005.4
[Footnote] 4 On March 7-8, 2007, Mr. Eichenwald testified as a prosecution witness in the Michigan criminal case against defendant, Ken Gourlay. During his testimony he was confronted by both the prosecutor and the defense about a previously undisclosed and unreported $2,000.00 check that he sent Justin Berry. Because of the looming backlash from the $2,000.00 check, the NY Times printed an Editor’s Note, reporting that Mr. Eichenwald did not make his editors aware of the $2,000.00 payment to Justin Berry and correcting Mr. Eichenwald’s earlier articles.
On March 8, 2007, Jack Shafer wrote an article for Slate magazine (a Washington Post publication) reporting the contradictory explanations by both Mr. Eichenwald and his New York Times editors regarding the $2,000.00 check. See, Exhibit D (3/8/07 Article, “Eichenwald’s Weird Checkbook Journalism”).
On March 25, 2007, “the public editor” for the NY Times, Byron Calame, wrote an article criticizing Mr. Eichenwald and the editors of his December 19, 2005 articles for the taboo ethical infraction and for failing to disclose the unauthorized $2,000.00 payment. See, Exhibit E (3/25/07 Article, “Money, a Source and New Questions About a Story”). In April, 2007, freelance journalist for the New Yorker, CounterPunch and other magazines, Debbie Nathan, wrote an article unraveling other information incorrectly reported by Mr. Eichenwald and debunking Justin Berry’s icon status as the consummate “victim.” See, Exhibit F (April 2006 Article, “The New York Time, Kurt Eichenwald and the World of Justin Berry”). According to the article, Mr. Eichenwald attempted to stop the publication of the article by threatening a $10 Million lawsuit. Mr. Eichenwald is widely known for his litigious tendencies, and by threatening to sue, he succeeded in convincing the editors of Salon magazine to “unpublish” one of Nathan’s previously published internet articles on Mr. Eichenwald in 2006.
http://www.freecasey.com/about/transcripts/P_v_Gourlay___Eichenwald_testimony_3_8_07_P__P_.pdf
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN v KENNETH RICHARD GOURLAY
EXCERPT OF JURY TRIAL - TESTIMONY OF KURT EICHENWALD BEFORE THE HONORABLE ARCHIE C. BROWN Ann Arbor, Michigan - Thursday, March 8, 2007
Note: DOUGLAS M. BAKER is the People's lawyer asking Questions to Kurt.
Page 96 to 99
Q. And there was testimony that came in about a book deal that was offered to him?
A. Yes.
Q. Conditioned upon him not going on Oprah?
A. Yes.
Q. Did he have a conversation with you about that?
A. Yes.
Q. And what was that?
A. I had received an e-mail from Steve Ryan that included a copy of an e-mail he had received, from the Reagan Books Imprint of Harper Collins Publishing. And Reagan Books was offering Justin a book deal valued at $500,000 dollars. And it had as a–-it had several conditions. But the primary condition was they had learned from Ryan that he was about to appear on Oprah.
And the primary condition was, he had to cancel his appearance on Oprah. The reason for that is, it is great to be on Oprah if you have a book. It’s not great if you haven’t written it yet. And the value of that deal, the value to Harper Collins was based on the expectation that once Justin wrote a book, they could get him on Oprah. If he had already been on Oprah, the deal had no value. Or the deal, in their mind, had no value because there was no offer for what he would get if he didn’t go on Oprah. And I talked with Ryan about it. And I fully expected that was the end of our Oprah appearance.
Q. Did Justin have a conversation with you about it?
A. Yes. I’m sorry. I didn’t answer that question. Yes, he did.
Q. And what was that?
A. I told him about the offer. And started explaining how it worked. And he stopped me and said, how many people read a book? And I said, if it’s a really big, nonfiction seller, about 300,000. And he said how many people watch Oprah? And I said, about 40 million a week, I think. And he said–-I’ll never forget this. He said, so really it comes down to I have a choice between buying myself a Diablo Lamborghini or helping save kids lives. And that’s not a hard choice to make. And that was it. He was going to go, he was going to turn down the book deal.
Q. Did you ask him to reconsider that?
A. I wanted–-I was very frightened that he was doing what he thought I wanted him to do. And I was–-I thought this was a circumstance where he could really, you know, establish a life for himself. And I said, you understand. You know, this is not money that is going to be around on Wednesday. I mean, this is the condition. Look what you can do with your life with this? And he says, nope. That’s my decision. I actually called his mother. And I said I’m afraid he is making this decision because of what he thinks I want him to do. And she said, nope. That’s Justin. He’s just made his decision. And so then we had one more conversation about it.
Q. What was that?
A. I went back to him again. Because I just couldn’t quite understand, you know. I mean basically he is saying, I’m not, you know. I’m going-–he has no money, no job, no, you know–-but I’m going to go ahead and do this. And I just wanted to make sure again that it wasn’t me. And I started talking about it again. And he looked at me and said, Kurt, you don’t understand. I already took the masturbation money. And at that moment, I understood. I said. Fine.
MR. BAKER: Nothing further.
http://www.oprah.com/oprahshow/seduced-in-cyberspace
Seduced in Cyberspace
Despite death threats, 19-year-old Justin is appearing on The Oprah Winfrey Show to reveal the secret world of online child webcam pornography. Justin, who also turned down a lucrative book deal to appear on the show, hopes his decision will help children around the world.
Mainstream Media Coverage
Retrieved: 25 February 2017
While there was some mainstream media coverage, there isn't all that much besides the widely known $2000 check Kurt gave to Justin…
Retrieved: 25 February 2017
Only alternative media outlets mentioned that Kurt may have viewed child pornography at least 22 times…
I will discuss more on the mainstream media coverage in a later video so stay tuned!
Summary and Conclusions
It is clear from the court documents, that Kurt Eichenwald was WAY too involved with the main character in his investigation, Justin Berry, which raises the question of just how much of his articles are accurate.
- Nonetheless, his articles which I reviewed in Parts 13 and 14 provide an incredible insight into the mindset and tactics that pedophiles use to manipulate and exploit children, as well as the cyclical nature in which the abused become the abuser… so make sure to watch those videos!
It is also clear that Kurt Eichenwald almost certainly viewed child pornography of Justin Berry masturbating alongside a 14-year child, at least 22 times…
Kurt also paid Justin at least $3000, almost certainly for pornography, and almost-certainly for child pornography…
Also, the question of whether Kurt used his journalism to hide his illegal online activities remains…
This goes to show that even with court documents, IP Addresses, Computer Logs, and Credit Card Information showing that Kurt almost certainly funded and viewed many child pornography many times, as well as lying under oath, the media and law enforcement simply ignore this…
What happens to people that write about this??
https://twitter.com/BillMoranWrites
Archive: http://archive.is/cOiOg
Stay Tuned for #PizzaGate Part 16…
Watch the Rest of my ongoing #PizzaGate Video Tutorial Series: https://steemit.com/pizzagate/@mes/pizzagate-video-tutorial-series-on-youtube-easy-to-follow-and-fully-sourced