In #PizzaGate Part 24 I go over an extensive analyze of the Google Search Trends data for the phrases “pizzagate” and “fake news” to show how the charts given are actually very misleading, as compared with what I deem as more reliable data coming from the Google AdWords Keyword Planner. The Google Search Trends data shows that, besides the initial peak in pizzagate searches, “fake news” is trending much higher than pizzagate.

First off it is important to note that Google Search Trends actually presents a semi-broad search trend in that phrases that include the given term, such as “CNN Fake News” or “Voat PizzaGate”. But in the video I show that these longer phrases actually make up a very small percentage of the total searches, besides a few short time periods, and thus the Google Search Trends data should be representing more or less the exact “pizzagate” and “fake news” search terms, or at least supposed to represent that.

To double check how accurate the Google Search Trends are, I compared them with Google’s AdWords Keyword Planner, which is the main search tool used by Advertisers. Since Advertisers spends BILLIONS through AdWords, it is reasonable to assume that the AdWords Keyword tool should be leaned on for any discrepancies that may arise with the Google Search Trends tool. The AdWords data suggests that “fake news” and “pizzagate” are searched similarily in recent months, but the initial peak in “pizzagate” was MUCH higher than the Search Trends data, with 1.8 million searches in both November and December!

Since the AdWords data are collected differently from the relative volume search of the Search Trends tool, I argue that matching the data along the recent months for the “pizzagate” searches would be the most accurate because the related queries are extremely small during these periods. The results better show how the “fake news” Search Trends data appear to not align with the AdWords data.

It is my view that it is unlikely that the differences in the search data between AdWords and Google Search Trends is just an unintentional consequence of Google’s (confusing) algorithms being used. Nonetheless, more data and comparisons with other queries and 3rd party search tools are needed before I can confirm any “intent”, which could possibly be to allude to the public that “pizzagate” is just another fringe conspiracy. Also interesting is that there is no discrepancy between the two datasets for before November 2016, which both show very little searches for “fake news” and “pizzagate”, which further illustrate to my hypothesis that “fake news” was a propaganda campaign used to discredit “pizzagate”.

Also in this video I talk briefly about Antifa and BAMB’s connection to the pro-pedophilia group NAMBLA, James Comey’s possibly shady background, even more YouTube censorship, and the VERY interesting Sumerian Gematria calculations of “PizzaGate” = 666 = “Mark Of Beast” and “Emmanuel Macron” = 888 = “Donald J. Trump”…. #TheRabbitHoleDeepens

Stay Tuned For #PizzaGate Part 25…

Watch video on:

3Speak:
Odysee: https://odysee.com/@mes:8/pizzagate-part-24-misleading-pizzagate:e?lid=d93456222ba64e13c31ec872f15a1e43da4d6bee
BitChute:
Rumble:
DTube:
YouTube:

Download video notes:

PDF: https://1drv.ms/b/s!As32ynv0LoaIhvNiEJV4SaZonKjrbA
Excel: https://1drv.ms/x/s!As32ynv0LoaIhvMM_1yyCW4miBpteQ

View the full video series: @mes/videos

View Video Notes Below!

Download these notes: Link is in video description.
View these notes as an article: @mes
Subscribe via email: http://mes.fm/subscribe
Donate! :) https://mes.fm/donate
Buy MES merchandise! https://mes.fm/store
More links: https://linktr.ee/matheasy

Reuse of my videos:

Feel free to make use of / re-upload / monetize my videos as long as you provide a link to the original video.

Fight back against censorship:

Bookmark sites/channels/accounts and check periodically

Remember to always archive website pages in case they get deleted/changed.

Recommended Books:

"Where Did the Towers Go?" by Dr. Judy Wood: https://mes.fm/judywoodbook

Subscribe to MES Truth: https://mes.fm/truth
MES Links Telegram channel: https://t.me/meslinks

Join my forums!

Hive community: created/hive-128780

Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/AMAZINGMathStuff

Discord: https://mes.fm/chatroom

Follow along my epic video series:

#MESScience: https://mes.fm/science-playlist

#MESExperiments: @mes/list

#AntiGravity: @mes/series
-- See Part 6 for my Self Appointed PhD and #MESDuality breakthrough concept!

#FreeEnergy: https://mes.fm/freeenergy-playlist

#PG (YouTube-deleted series): @mes/videos

NOTE #1: If you don't have time to watch this whole video:

Skip to the end for Summary and Conclusions (if available)

Play this video at a faster speed.
-- TOP SECRET LIFE HACK: Your brain gets used to faster speed!
-- MES tutorial: @mes/play-videos-at-faster-or-slower-speeds-on-any-website

Download and read video notes.

Read notes on the Hive blockchain #Hive

Watch the video in parts.
-- Timestamps of all parts are in the description.

Browser extension recommendations:

Increase video speed: https://mes.fm/videospeed-extension

Increase video audio: https://mes.fm/volume-extension

Text to speech: https://mes.fm/speech-extension
--Android app: https://mes.fm/speech-android

Recap on Previous Parts

Parts 1, 4-10: Madeleine McCann Case / Podesta / Pedophilia Connections
Part 2, 3: ACORN Controversy
Part 7: Conspiracy Advice for Online Researchers.
Part 11: National Pizza Day Strange Coincidences
Part 12: FBI Document on Pedophilia Symbols and Logos
Part 13, 14: Mindset and Tactics of Pedophiles
Part 15, 17: Kurt Eichenwald is Above the Law
Part 16: Alex Jones has dirt on Bill Clinton
Part 18: Vault 7 Year Zero makes blackmail ease.
Part 19: Memetics and Meme Warfare
Part 20: BLogo / LBLogo Origins
Part 21: GLogo Origins
Part 22: CLogo Origins
Part 23: Pedophilia Normalization
ALL Parts: #PizzaGate Updated + Media Cover-Up and/or Silence

View All Videos: @mes/videos

#PizzaGate Part 24

Topics to Cover:

PizzaGate Updates
Misleading Google Search Trends

PizzaGate Updates

ANTIFA, BAMB, and the NAMBLA connection…**

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1825882

BREAKING: BERKELEY ANTIFA GROUP WITH TIES TO MAYOR LINKED TO NAMBLA PEDOPHILES! - THIS IS NOT A DRILL PEDES! r/The_Donald
28 April 2017 by FoxMcCloud11
Archive: https://archive.is/mqdAi

The "Anti-Fascists" group Antifa (and BAMB) that are trying to silence free speech has some very troubling ties to the pro-pedophilia group NAMBLA… # YouCantMakeThisStuffUp # NotReallySurprised

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1854208
Archive: https://archive.is/ILjGQ

When James Comey was 15, he and his younger brother Peter were held by the armed "Ramsey rapist". No one was charged.

………. The rabbit hole deepens..

Seriously is there any person working in the intelligence agency doesn't have a "potentially" shady background… # AbolishTheFBI # AbolishTheCIA

Sumerian Gematria Calculator: "PizzaGate" = 666….. !!!! # MarkOfBeast # WTF

http://www.gematrinator.com/calculator/index.php
Retrieved: 12 May 2017

I am very new to the Gematria side of things, but I still find it VERY interesting that the Sumerian Gematria Calculator states that "PizzaGate" = 666 = "Mark of Beast".

Also interesting is that "Emmanuel Macron" = 888 = "Donald J. Trump"…. # Interesting

I may look into this further in later videos, so stay tuned…

Also, if you have some insights into Gematria and the connections between all the different types, please let me know! :)

YouTube Censorship as usual….

Just as my views are increasing, YouTube decides to stop paying… # WTF # YouTubeIsEvil # YouTubeExodus

Follow me on Hive and create your own account ASAP! @mes

Misleading 'PizzaGate' Google Search Trends

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1827743
29 April 2017 by matheasysolutions
Archive: https://archive.is/asMjk

IMPORTANT: Proof that Google Search Trends are MISLEADING for PizzaGate vs. Fake News

I posted a while a go on Voat illustrating how the Google Search Trends for "pizzagate" and "fake news" were misleading, because according to Google AdWords search data, "pizzagate" was actually searched much more than "fake news"!

Recall from earlier video on Google Search Trends:

https://support.google.com/trends/answer/4359550
Retrieved: 6 May 2017
Archive: https://archive.is/MDb9J

Note: No misspellings, spelling variations, synonyms, plural or singular versions of your terms are included..

…

• If you search the term banana, results include searches for terms like "banana" or "banana sandwich."
• If you specify banana sandwich, results include searches for "banana sandwich" as well as "banana for lunch" and "peanut butter sandwich."

https://support.google.com/trends/answer/4359582?hl=en&ref_topic=4365530
Retrieved: 6 May 2017
Archive: https://archive.is/XZmZa

Search tips for Trends

You can use punctuation in your searches to filter the results you see in Trends.

Let's take a closer look at the search trends for "fake news" and "pizzagate".

Note that the trends for "fake news" and "pizzagate" both include longer phrases, as long as the exact terms are included.

https://trends.google.ca/trends/explore?date=2016-05-15%202017-05-09&q=pizzagate,fake%20news

https://trends.google.ca/trends/explore?date=2016-05-15%202017-05-09&q=%22pizzagate%22,%22fake%20news%22

https://trends.google.ca/trends/explore?date=2016-05-15%202017-05-09&q=%22pizzagate%22,%22fake%20news%22,pizzagate,fake%20news

Note that "fake news" is just a bit below the broad search term fake news.

Thus even though according to Google, the "fake news" search may include longer phrases that include the exact match "fake news", it is very unlikely that those long phrases have a significant impact, because the broad search type is not even much more than the exact.

https://trends.google.ca/trends/explore?date=2016-05-15%202017-05-09&q=pizzagate,%22fake%20news%22
Retrieved: 9 May 2017

From this graph it is clear that "fake news" is trending much more than "pizzagate" despite "pizzagate" having a much larger peak in traffic.

Let's take a look at some of the locations searching these terms:

The country in blue, i.e. searched PizzaGate more than Fake News was Turkey. # Interesting…

Since the Search Trends includes all phrases that include "fake news", let's see how the relative size is of the top related phrases "fake news trump" and "cnn fake news".

https://trends.google.ca/trends/explore?date=2016-05-15%202017-05-09&q=%22fake%20news%20trump%22,%22fake%20news%22,%22fake%20news%20cnn%22,%22trump%20fake%20news%22,%22cnn%20fake%20news%22
Retrieved: 9 May 2017

Note that "cnn fake news" and "trump fake news" have higher trends than "fake news trump", even though "fake news trump" was the "top" query.

This shows that first off all, the "top" related queries are misleading because the actual "top" ones listed in the previous table aren't necessarily the actual top related searches… # WTF # GoogleGetYourActTogether
Nonetheless, it appears that these "top" related searches are relatively very small, besides at during two peak times, and thus it can be assumed that most of the Google Search Trends data is due to the exact phrase "fake news".

https://trends.google.ca/trends/explore?date=2016-05-15%202017-05-09&q=%22what%20is%20pizzagate%22,pizzagate,%22pizzagate%20reddit%22,%22pizzagate%20voat%22,%22voat%20pizzagate%22
Retrieved: 9 May 2017

Like-wise, the top related queries are searched relatively little, and thus it can be assumed that the exact phrase "pizzagate" is the main driver of the Google Search Trends data.

Thus it is reasonable to assume that the exact terms "pizzagate" and "fake news" are more or less as shown in the Google Search Trends charts.

https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/6325039
Retrieved: 9 May 2017
Archive: https://archive.is/S5qZY

Keyword Planner: Get search volume data and trends

You can use Keyword Planner to get historical statistics, such as average monthly searches and competition data, for a list of keywords.

…

Tip
If you use keyword match types with your keywords, we take only those match types into account when calculating traffic forecasts. For example, if you add a keyword as exact match, like [Cabo luxury resort], your forecasts will give you an idea how that keyword might perform as an exact match keyword.

This keyword planner is used by Advertisers on Google so I put more trust onto this tool because the results of this tool DIRECTLY leads to BILLIONS of dollars spent by Advertisers.

Thus we should compare the Google Search Trends data with the AdWords Keyword Planner, and give preference to AdWords for any discrepancy.

https://adwords.google.com/ko/KeywordPlanner
Retrieved: 8 May 2017

As can be seen the average search volume for pizzagate is more than DOUBLE that of "fake news", and all other "top" searches are indeed relatively very small.

I downloaded all the keyword data broken down in a monthly basis to obtain the following data.

Download Link: https://1drv.ms/x/s!As32ynv0LoaIhvMM_1yyCW4miBpteQ

NOTE: If the link doesn't work, please check video description for correct link, or contact me if that stops working too.

From this graph, it can be seen that "pizzagate" has a MUCH higher peak, and was larger than "fake news" for nearly every month, except April 2017. # WeGottaStepUpOurGame

Note the difference between the Google Search Trends data:

https://trends.google.ca/trends/explore?date=2016-05-15%202017-05-09&q=pizzagate,%22fake%20news%22
Retrieved: 9 May 2017

I also manually plotted the Google Search Trends relative search data and compared it to the AdWords Data:

Note that there are multiple ways of interpreting the comparison because the Google Search Trends data is more broad than the exact terms in AdWords.

Thus in aligning how to compare the two data sets together, let's first look at the previous chart from above:

Notice how during the November/December period the term "what is pizzagate" was search relatively high.

But notice how "CNN Fake News" was searched relatively high during January.

This suggests that during November/December, the fact that "pizzagate" was a new term likely caused people searching for "pizzagate" using more broad queries, and thus the Google Search Trends data should be noticeably larger than the "exact" data by AdWords.

This chart, also from above, further illustrates that this is the case.

Thus if we include even more terms, the combination of them all should have a significant impact at the peak trend in November / December.

Like-wise, the related queries to "fake news" have peaks during January and a smaller peak during February, as illustrated by the chart below (also taken from above):

This is likely because of when Trump called CNN "fake news" in January, and then "very fake news" in February! HAHAHAHA # ItsFunnyBecauseItsTrue

Now understanding where the related queries peak is important when comparing Google Search Trends vs. AdWords data, because we need to accurately align the data sets, since both represents different data, i.e. "broad" vs. "exact" trends.

Thus the likely most comparable data sets are when the related queries are negligible compared to the exact term.

Thus I have chosen to align the most recent search data for the "pizzagate" query.

Notice how the peak Google Search Trends Data exceeds beyond the AdWords data as it should be because of the relatively high related queries searches during November / December.

The rest of the time period appears to closely match for both charts, as was expected.

Also note that it is difficult to align the two data sets properly, for the reasons just explained, but as well as for the fact that the Google Search Trends data is given in weeks, while the AdWords data is in months.

But luckily the April Google Search Trends weekly data is fairly horizontal, thus we can align the AdWords monthly data by changing the vertical scales so that the April Data match up for both charts.

This alignment serves as a the benchmark upon which the "fake news" data can also be plotted together.

This graphs shows that the Google Search Trends were much higher for "fake news" than the AdWords data for nearly the entire time period.

This suggests that either the related queries combine to be relatively very high, for more than just the two peak periods I already alluded to, or the data is not actually representative of the actual search trends.

Putting all the graphs together we see a better picture of how the "fake news" data from Google Search Trends are much higher than the AdWords data for both "pizzagate" and "fake news".

Note the similar and extremely low data for all the search terms before October 2016… # Interesting…

As pointed out numerous times above, I believe that besides just at one or two short time periods where related queries were searched high, there shouldn't be too much deviation from the Google AdWords "exact" data.

Regardless of what the graphs should or shouldn't look like, they are very misleading when considering the "exact" search phrases.

A perfect example of this is the following comparison between AdWords and Google Search Trends during the "peak" searches:

Notice how AdWords suggests "pizzagate" peaked at double the % difference of the Search Trends data.

Now, the question of whether this is intentional on the part of Google requires more data on various other keywords and phrases for comparison, which I may look into in a later video.

Summary and Conclusions

The Google Search Trends suggests that "fake news" has been for the most part searched significantly more than "pizzagate".

The AdWords search trends show the opposite, in that "pizzagate" has been searched more for the most part and only dropped down slightly below "fake news" last month on April. # WeGottaStepUpOurGame

It is my view, that the AdWords search trends are to be more trusted when any discrepancies arise from the Google Search Trends data because there is a higher incentive to give accurate data to advertisers, which totals in the billions per year.

While Google Search Trends is a "broad" search type in that longer phrases are taken into account, yet include the selected search term, it is reasonable to assume that the Google Search Trends should show higher search traffic than of the "exact" search type in AdWords.

But after comparing some of the "top" Search Trends related queries, there are only few short time periods where they are searched enough to suggest they impact the overall trends in any significant way.

This is especially highlighted by the fact that the fake news term without the quotations " ", is searched only slightly higher than "fake news" through Google Search Trends.

Note that fake news accounts for any phrase that includes "fake" or "news" in any order, and was only slightly higher than any phrase that includes exactly "fake news".

During their peak searches, "pizzagate" was searched over 3 times more than "fake news" according AdWords, but only just over 1.5 times according to Google Search Trends.

This is a massive discrepancy, just over double the difference, which I personally doubt it was just an unintentional consequence on the part of Google.

But I need to look at more data from other queries and comparisons, and maybe even other 3rd party keyword search tools, before I can prove any "intent" which Google may have, possibly to give the public the impression that the #PizzaGate was just a small fringe conspiracy.

I may look into this further in later videos, so stay tuned!

And as a reminder, since the AdWords data suggests "pizzagate" is losing steam to "fake news", we need to up our game and keep pushing #PizzaGate further!!

Stay Tuned for #PizzaGate Part 25…