Hello Boys and Girls,
A theater company in NYC produced a play that depecits the killing of Donald Trump...as far as I know that is a threat, and threatening someones life is illegal. Well some of the origional sponsors of the play withdrew there support (As I believe they should), and certain sponsors chose to go down with the ship (although the ship is not down yet, but what they are doing will harm there own cause). I am recomending that letters of aproval and/or disaproval be sent to the sponcers (do not send private emails where they can be pidgon holed) instead send them messages on social media (that way the public at large can be informed of their deeds :)
Sponcers that withdrew there support:
-Delta Airlines
-Bank of Amercia
Sponcers that aproved of the event:
-The NY Times
-NYC Mayor (I feel confident that he does not want the voting public to know of his deeds)
-Time Warner Communications
-Amercian Express (you migh not want that in your wallet)
How can numerous business executives be alerted to the same play and walk away with two very diffrent outlooks?
Scott Adams is the creator of the cartoon strip Dilbert. He is skilled in the art of debate and he pants a picture saying that there are two diffrent movies playing in the minds of amercians. The first movie see's Donald Trump as a monster, so when a "joke" is made about murdering him movie goers laugh because they think that it is funny. The second movie views Donald Trump as a voice that speaks up for the avrage amercian. The movie goers of movie #1 do not understand why the movie goers of #2 find the "funny joke" appauling. (That explains why Kathy Griffins thought that it was a comic action to hold up the severed, bloody head of the President.
http://www.fox46charlotte.com/news/260551605-story