As we can see, there are no perfect people.
My comments: A lot of people seem to look for or want leadership. Then when the leaders aren't perfect they get thrown out for violating social norms, moral crimes, etc. Then if you look at history you find that leaders have always been flawed but society had to look beyond their flaws in favor of their strengths.
My theory: Any leadership will be morally flawed in some way. In fact, the model of centralized leadership is a problem because any human in a position of leadership has flaws, flaws which can be discovered, encouraged, exacerbated over time, which makes all leaders susceptible to blackmail and manipulation if they are human and in a position of power for too long. Decentralization is a way of trying to resolve the problem of flawed leadership by spreading authority to the crowd or by obfuscating the leadership so there is no single point of attack. With the idea that all humans are flawed so reliability of any particular human is limited, but as a whole humans are more reliable than any individual.