Yes. And as a single parent with equally shared custody of both kids, I find your question vaguely insulting and misogynistic. In certain societies, yes, men acquire resources and women do not, but in most pre-religious societies of the past (and the post-religious present), both men and women acquired resources, though in different ways suited to the different physique of the sexes. This allowed early humans to maximise resource gathering, by harnessing the strengths of all humans and not merely relying on the larger, more aggressive males alone. This in itself, one could argue, is the historical nature of your alleged emasculation of men, and it long pre-dates the very concept of the nation state. I points rather to the massive evolutionary advantage of co-operation within the species. And hence the evolutionary advantage of co-operation on a national and supra-national scale now.