Yeah I wrote about believing it was Seth Rich that seemed most probable to me many months ago when the Russian narrative first began before Trump had even been inaugurated. It is the only thing that makes sense.
The FBI has not been given access to the DNCs servers yet they claim to have evidence it is the Russians. Even if they did have access to the servers that still would not be evidence. I wrote several pieces from a network engineering (yes that is how I pay my bills) perspective on why that is not reliable evidence or really evidence at all. In my role I have to lock down compromised servers, find hacker activity, block IPs, and do things like that on a fairly regular basis. So I wrote about the russian hacker stories from a position of knowledge about the subject.
RE: So a little while back I asked a serious question about what Trump had done wrong with actual evidence...