Are New Hampshire's representatives finally taking a closer look at alternative voting systems? For years, the state elections committee in the state house has rejected any proposed changes to NH's voting system, regardless of how much sense they have made. However, now that Maine has adopted "ranked choice" voting, perhaps NH's reps are taking the issue more seriously.
I was surprised recently to receive a call from Keene Sentinel reporter Jake Lahut asking me for my opinion on ranked choice voting for an article that appeared last week. As someone who has been a longtime libertarian, I've seen how the "vote for one" system we have in place hurts third parties, so I definitely support ranked choice and its competitor, the easier "approval voting".
Both systems solve the "wasted vote syndrome" where voters, afraid of the worst of the two evils winning, will vote for the "lesser evil" of the two major party candidates. They will do this even though they may better agree with a third party candidate, like a Green or Libertarian, simply out of fear of their least favorite major party candidate winning.
Ranked choice allows the voter to rank their favorites on the ballot while approval voting allows the voter to simply vote for all those candidates they'd be alright with winning the election.
Last week in the state house, HB 505 was heard that would allow for approval voting to take hold in New Hampshire's elections. Here's the bill's full hearing in front of the house elections committee:
