Sometimes in our frustration with the modern legal system, we forget that laws in the first place were made by humans for themselves.
I sometimes find the people on both sides of the argument using words that undermine their own point. At 2:33 he uses the word 'legitimately', when the premise of the debate itself is on deciding what 'legitimate' is.
I think laws or no laws, this struggle to find an optimal way of living lives is eternal. In the end we need to change whats inside of us and then look outside. For example, I personally love to question the morals of the bankers and the banking system but what would happen if I were happen to be born in a banking family where I inherit a multi million dollar worth of banking fortune - would I be then question the morals of my family.
We need to consider the people standing on the other side of the argument if we hope to reach a solution.
RE: Q for Kafkanarchy