Although I agree with your premise about Venezuela, don't you think that calling those who have a different opinion CONTRARY to what we are collectively seeking? i.e., a healthy and respectful debate - at least for those like us trying to sway the opinions of those who would otherwise support the opposition of Venezuela? In other words, wouldn't there be more compelling arguments to make instead of aggressive criticisms? Lastly, doesn't this kind of language emit a negative vibration which is counter-intuitive to the ultimate goal (which I think we agree would be "peace")?

And don't you think that by employing such aggressive language you are not willfully (or ignorantly) partaking in the divide-and-conquer tactics by making careless statements like "fucking morons" to others?

I would have expected a lot better and more constructive rhetoric from a journalist of your caliber.

Highly dissapointed...

Respectfully,