I don't particularly like politics or the fact that our so called news agencies are really just talking horses asses. However when Politics and News can be demonstrated to be in bed with each other I just can't pass up passing on the knowledge and providing my followers with a genuine analysis, and what goes for real evidence these days. So we start with an article on ex parte meetings between government officials and industry.
June 28, 2017 at 11:03 am
Written by Andrea Germanos
"Records obtained by AP show that Pruitt had a 30-minute meeting with Dow CEO Andrew Liveris"
What is most shocking to me is that the meeting by Pruitt and the Dow CEO isn't as far as I can tell being compared to the Clinton meeting on the Oh so famous private jet. In my humble opinion the criminal activity within mind control (Government) looks entirely the same in every aspect. Is this reflecting the fact that chemical companies own a slice of the pie or what?
I have to wonder if I am the only person who sees this as act 1 scene two? Is it just me or does this situation look decidedly the same callous disregard for proper appearance and a thumbing of the noses at law.?
The article explains that "According to EPA spokeswoman Liz Bowman, the men were only “briefly introduced” and “did not discuss chlorpyrifos.” (Bowman, for her part, came to the EPA from the American Chemistry Council, an industry group of which Dow is a member.)"
Am I the only one who reads this and begins smelling the oh so familiar smell of political Bravo Sierra" In the statement "the men were only “briefly introduced” and “did not discuss chlorpyrifos.” begs "how does she know"?
Also why would that information need to be released by a EPA spokeswoman? I have got to wonder if perhaps some alternative news are not as alternative as they would like us to think.
Now some people might think I am talking conspiracy theories. So I would like to provide a short youtube video on the subject of conspiracy theories. In it the fact that the phrase "Conspiracy Theories" has been weaponized is discussed.
by Truthstream media
This 1967 CIA Memo Is Still Used to Discredit Conspiracy Theorists Today
It is pretty clear that people who use the ideas advertised about conspiracy theories to discredit or dismiss a claim are really just demonstrating the fact of their own programming and that they have not challenged their own incorrect thinking.
Another very interesting article that people need to know about is done by James F. Tracy for Global Research center. It discuss the fact that media is in bed through the CIA. It shows the history and just how all pervasive the corruption is and thus why a mountain of salt need to be taken no matter what the propaganda news source.
The Global Research center: They do research on Globalization.
I think it is pretty clear that if you don't check things out for yourself and question what you believe: then what you believe has the same chance of being true as a snowballs life span in hell. A very real and important question for the smart and investigative Steemians is have you challenged any of your world views? Also if you have can you share them with us?