I'm of the impression that if you follow politics long enough, you either learn how to do this yourself, or you dive in head first into cynicism.

Feature, not a bug

When I complain about this to someone (usually the wife), I'm reminded of how this is not a bug, but an important feature of the political machine.

You see, it seems to be that we expect our politicians to be able to sound intelligent, well read and capable of handling the job, even if we don't understand the jargon.

I've come to the conclusion that lazy people, lazy thinkers, that is, prefer this type of political figure. It might be that it allows them cover for partisanship hackery, but then again that much is speculative.

To be specific

Is not a good tactic. To give a measurable answer, a quantifiable measurement. Is too close to making a solid promise and thus needs to be avoided.

It's clear to me. If Fauci, for example, was to talk in percentages, solid numbers, he would be held accountable for doing so. This is how the flatten the curve became wait for the cure, and it's now becoming a "who knows when".

Same goes for other political figures out there. They cannot,and do not need to be specifics because most of us don't care to demand them to.

It's frustrating to say the least

Yes, I'm being facetious, but I hope my point is clear. If we are looking to our leaders for clear direction, then we are stabbing rocks (they don't bleed).

I can do it too

It's really not that hard to sound like a politician. All you have to do is promise nothing concrete, and make it sound pretty.

Let's give it a go... with a blockchain flavor of course:

We must embrace in a quantifiable way the promises of new technologies to free ourselves from limitations. If we work together and embrace the upcoming shift, we can disrupt the current power dynamics and bring forth a better tomorrow.

I'm MenO and I endorse this message...