I came across this article while doing research for my report on the post birth. . .I refuse to use their words that make them feel Better about the murderous people they ARE!
Article link at bottom.
It is Infanticide plain and simple! When will they have gone too far for their voter base?
When is it Enough for Dem voters? I say Please stop supporting these Wicked leaders! They are Not for protecting the rights of humanity. . .especially our most vulnerable, most innocent? Why is that? Do you ever ask yourself this question? I sure do!
This article is from 2014, same year I found a transcript from Melissa Harris Perry where she was talking about how it should be up to the parents if a baby lives or dies. I never watched her, but didn't take the word of the article I read, I hunted down the transcript. Glad I Never watched her and didn't even Know who she was.
They need their sacrifice so much. ..the demon kind literally feed off of it, that they are willing to go to Any lengths to get it.
They now don't just talk about including after birth, but Children!
My point is. ..they were talking about it in 2014. ..get rid of kids up to 5 because. ..according to them,
“Since their requirements for personhood are completely arbitrary, they throw around numbers, you know, four years old, five years old. I had one friend say a college professor claimed six years old was a good cut-off,” she added.
Blood thirsty people and demons who have given themselves over to satan have No Boundaries. That is why it's Never enough for them.
Not enough to take those prior to birth, now outside of birth so we know there will be yet another push.
How far will they go?
They will go as far as We the People let them!
This madness must end. These murderers Must be STopped!
Where's the line. ..they already passed it when they used McCorvey as a pawn in Roe vs. Wade.
Here she had already had that baby, That daughter's grown now, in her 40's and McCorvey wants it overturned because she states, it was based on a lie, she wasn't raped and these democrat, child sacrifice hungry people used her.
I always ask because I wasn't there. ..Why didn't people Stand in the face of this? Was it that 501c3 that hushed pastors at their pulpit? Where in the World was the outrage? Where?
This article link below states,
In February 2012, The Journal of Medical Ethics published a controversial article entitled “After birth abortion, why should the baby live?” by Australian philosophers Francesca Minerva and Alberto Giubilini that argued that “when circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible,” even for “non-medical reasons”.
The authors pointed out that they used the term “after-birth abortion” instead of “infanticide” because they wanted to “emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus… rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be.”
“Since non-persons have no moral rights to life,” they concluded, “there are no reasons for banning after-birth abortions,” adding that “we do not put forward any claim about the moment at which after-birth abortion would no longer be permissible.”
Now we are here, yet another throng of evil doers pushing to take Even more lives.
We must pray and fight directly against this evil! What if it is No longer just up to the parents to decide? What if They start deciding whether your baby lives or dies?
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/some-college-students-approve-after-birth-abortion-age-5
Another source,
Journal of Medical Ethics
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?