The left still asserts the goodness of communism, whose triumph condemned more than 100 million people to death - just directly. The latest example of such propaganda barbarism took place in Ecuador, where the National Assembly (soviet) passed a resolution condemning the murder of terrorist Ernesto Che Guevara. Beyond this anecdote, the tragedy of the matter lies in the fact that many young people, politicians and intellectuals continue to praise the virtues of this totalitarian and genocidal ideology while their "anti-fascist" spirit roars with complete ease when, in reality, communism, fascism and Nazism form a common front. They are, in essence, diverse manifestations of anti-capitalist thinking.

In this sense, one of the most striking and contradictory aspects of these left-wing movements is their total ignorance of National Socialist ideology, which bears many similarities to communism. Both aspire to build society from scratch - for which the foundations of existing institutions must be broken down - a new world which, like a utopian paradise, will give rise to a renewed man (Aryan race vs. proletariat); whose individual will no longer be meaningful, for it will be diluted under the "common good" represented by the spirit of the people. Thus, the backbone of communists and Nazis is no more and no less than the idolatry of "true socialism".

Hitler and Lenin pursued a common goal: to eradicate individual freedom and capitalism. The first through a nationalist vision based on the struggle of races, and the second through an internationalist perspective based on the class struggle. Luciano Pellicani, in his work Lenin and Hitler, the two faces of totalitarianism, unravels to perfection the common denominator of both ideologies. Thus, it is enough to look at the anti-capitalist claims of the Nazi leaders to see the purely socialist germ of German totalitarianism and its hated brother the traditional leftist socialism praised by the new UN president, the Ecuadorian correlator Maria Fernanda Espinosa.

Hitler and Lenin pursued the same goal: to eradicate individual freedom and capitalism. The first had a nationalist vision based on the struggle of races; the second had an internationalist perspective based on class struggle. Luciano Pellicani, in his work Lenin and Hitler, the two faces of totalitarianism, unravels to perfection the common denominator of both ideologies. Thus, one only has to read the anti-capitalist claims of the Nazi leaders to see the purely socialist germ of Hitler's totalitarianism:

Adolf Hitler:

The strongest struggle should not be against the enemy peoples, but against international capital. The struggle against international financial capital was the most important programmatic point in the German nation's struggle for economic independence and freedom (...)

As the economy took over the state, money became the God that everyone had to worship on their knees (...) The stock market began to triumph and slowly but surely it set out to bring the life of the nation under its control (...) Capital must remain in the service of the state and not try to become the master of the nation.

Even after the war, we will not be able to give up state leadership of the economy, otherwise every private group will think exclusively of the satisfaction of its own aspirations. Since even in the great mass of the people every individual obeys selfish objectives, an orderly and systematic activity of the national economy is not possible without the leadership of the State.

I am not only the victor of Marxism, but also its director. In other words, that part of him that is essential and justified, stripped of the Hebrew-Talmudic dogma. National Socialism is what Marxism could have been if it had managed to break its absurd and superficial ties with a democratic order.

In view of the above, and since the Nazis fought as much or more than the Communists against evil capitalism, I wonder why the young anti-system do not stamp the Führer's face on red T-shirts with a swastika in the background, in the purest Che Guevara style, why this discrimination, if after all Hitler and Che pursued the same end, using, moreover, such similar means?