Your opinion counts: Do you want co-determination?

An important topic that I want to address. If you are involved with CryptoCompany, this article should be of interest to you.

Ein wichtiges Thema, das ich ansprechen will. Wenn Du mit CryptoCompany zu tun hast, sollte Dich dieser Artikel interessieren.

CryptoCompany was and is designed from the start to make a profit for users. Their growth is important to me. If CryptoCompany positions itself correctly, it will grow automatically and can develop further profitable opportunities.

My principle is simple: only if CryptoCompany is profitable for users can it profit itself. It is not a platform for the creator, but for the community.

That's why it's important to me that you see CryptoCompany as your CryptoCompany.

The joint growth has worked well so far. There shouldn't be anyone who has made a loss with CryptoCompany. Quite the opposite: no Bro Bang player has paid more than they won in the end. The CCD voting service attracts players with several hundred percent APR, and the HSBI generator comes on top. Sure, there are token holders who have decided to sell a token from CryptoCompany at a loss or only a small profit, but I can't change that. There are still open construction sites and potential in the CryptoCompany universe where value still needs to be created, e.g. with the SQM token or the delivery of NFTs in the CCDPACK token. However, anyone who looks at CryptoCompany's work to date and is not sitting on hot coals should be able to develop a sense of anticipation.

CryptoCompany war und ist von Anfang an darauf ausgelegt, Nutzern Gewinn zu bringen. Ihr Wachstum ist mir wichtig. Wenn sich CryptoCompany richtig positioniert, wächst es automatisch mit und kann weitere profitable Möglichkeiten entwickeln.

Mein Prinzip ist einfach: Nur wenn CryptoCompany für Nutzer profitabel ist, kann es selbst profitieren. Es ist keine Plattform für den Macher, sondern für die Gemeinschaft.

Deshalb ist es mir wichtig, dass du CryptoCompany auch als deine CryptoCompany verstehst.

Das gemeinsame Wachstum hat bisher gut funktioniert. Es dürfte niemanden geben, der mit CryptoCompany Verlust gemacht hat. Ganz im Gegenteil: Kein Spieler bei Bro Bang hat mehr gezahlt, als er am Ende gewonnen hat. Der CCD Voting-Service lockt mit mehreren hundert Prozent APR, der HSBI-Generator kommt oben drauf. Sicher gibt es Token-Holder, die entschieden haben, einen Token von CryptoCompany mit Verlust oder nur geringem Gewinn zu verkaufen, aber das kann ich nicht ändern. Es gibt noch offene Baustellen und Potenzial im CryptoCompany-Universum, wo der Wert erst geschaffen werden muss, z. B. beim SQM Token oder der Auslieferung der NFTs im CCDPACK Token. Wer das bisherige Wirken von CryptoCompany betrachtet und nicht auf heißen Kohlen sitzt, sollte dabei aber Vorfreude entwickeln können.

Your opportunities with CryptoCompany grow ...

... just like the community of participants and beneficiaries. This also increases my responsibility to organize everything in the best possible way. I am happy to take on this responsibility.

But I question whether I can always do this in the best possible way. I certainly have the most detailed insight into CryptoCompany and can make decisions based on this.

BUT: Even if I have the best insight into CCCEO, other Hivians can bring valuable perspectives to the table. Some have deeper insights or more in-depth experience in areas outside of CryptoCompany.

That's why I'm wondering if I should facilitate a panel. If I'm talking about your CryptoCompany, it makes sense to include you in the design. This swarm intelligence could benefit everyone. Currently, decisions depend on me alone, but I question myself. There are many clever Hivians on our chain - a synergy through the swarm would be valuable.

Specifically, what do you think about me allowing other CryptoCompany participants to add their voice?

I have not yet defined a model for this: How the voting process works, how votes are weighted or how I provide relevant information. Publicly accessible figures/data/facts? Regular “shareholder meetings”? I have received valuable advice from my previous advisors, even without comprehensive insight into the CCCEO figures. I have then incorporated such things directly into the dialog - and the dialogs have often yielded productive results.

Deine Möglichkeiten mit CryptoCompany wachsen ...

... genauso wie die Gemeinschaft der Teilnehmer und Nutznießer. Damit wächst auch meine Verantwortung, alles bestmöglich zu gestalten. Diese Verantwortung übernehme ich gerne.

Aber ich stelle die Frage, ob ich das immer im besten Sinne kann. Sicher habe ich den detailliertesten Einblick in CryptoCompany und kann darauf basierend Entscheidungen treffen.

ABER: Auch wenn ich den besten Einblick in CCCEO habe, können andere Hivians wertvolle Perspektiven einbringen. Manche haben tiefere Einblicke oder fundiertere Erfahrungen in Bereichen außerhalb von CryptoCompany.

Deshalb frage ich mich, ob ich ein Gremium ermöglichen sollte. Wenn ich von deiner CryptoCompany spreche, macht es Sinn, Dich in die Gestaltung einzubeziehen. Diese Schwarmintelligenz könnte allen nutzen. Derzeit hängen Entscheidungen allein von mir ab, aber ich stelle mich selbst infrage. Auf unserer Chain gibt es viele clevere Hivians – eine Synergie durch den Schwarm wäre wertvoll.

Konkret gefragt: Was hältst Du davon, wenn ich anderen CryptoCompany-Teilnehmern ermögliche, ihre Stimme einzubringen?

Ein Modell dafür habe ich noch nicht festgelegt: Wie die Stimmabgabe abläuft, wie Stimmen gewichtet werden oder wie ich relevante Informationen bereitstelle. Öffentlich einsehbare Zahlen/Daten/Fakten? Regelmäßige "Teilhaberversammlungen"? Von meinen bisherigen Beratern habe ich wertvolle Hinweise erhalten, auch ohne umfassenden Einblick in die CCCEO-Zahlen. Solch Dinge habe ich dann direkt im Dialog einfließen lassen - und die Dialoge haben oft fruchtbare Resultate gebracht.

My question to you:

Would it be interesting for you to think along with your CryptoCompany and contribute suggestions or ideas? Or do you say: “Paul, you're already doing that...”?

I think it would be positive to get more voices on board. And since it's your CryptoCompany, it would be useful to hear your voice.

How do you see it? How would you organize it for your CryptoCompany? How should voices be weighted? How could more co-determination be integrated? Do you see this development as positive? What problems do you see? Would you participate?

Thank you for your time and attention!

Meine Frage an Dich:

Wäre es für Dich interessant, an deiner CryptoCompany mitzudenken, Vorschläge oder Ideen einzubringen? Oder sagst Du: "Paul, Du machst das schon..."?

Ich glaube, es wäre positiv, mehr Stimmen ins Boot zu holen. Und da es deine CryptoCompany ist, wäre es sinnvoll, deine Stimme zu hören.

Wie siehst Du das? Wie würdest Du es für deine CryptoCompany gestalten? Wie sollten Stimmen gewichtet werden? Wie könnte mehr Mitbestimmung integriert werden? Siehst Du diese Entwicklung als positiv? Welche Probleme siehst Du? Würdest Du daran teilhaben wollen?

Danke für deine Zeit und Aufmerksamkeit!

Now it only remains for me to say... Enjoy your day & stay healthy!

See you later in the comments &
make the best out of the your time!

You like to stay informed or support CryptoCompany or PowerPaul?
Here are our articles from the last 7 days:
^{(and on all of them the commentrewarder is activated!)}

^{• Hive account@ccceo.voter | [ENG/DEU] CryptoCompany CCD Voting Service: recently processed votes & activities}
^{• Hive account@ccceo.voter | [ENG/DEU] CryptoCompany CCD Voting Service: recently processed votes & activities}
^{• Hive account@ccceo.voter | [ENG/DEU] CryptoCompany CCD Voting Service: recently processed votes & activities}
^{• Hive account@ccceo.voter | [ENG/DEU] CryptoCompany CCD Voting Service: recently processed votes & activities}
^{• Hive account@ccceo.voter | [ENG/DEU] CryptoCompany CCD Voting Service: recently processed votes & activities}
^{• Hive account@ccceo.voter | [ENG/DEU] CryptoCompany CCD Voting Service: recently processed votes & activities}
^{• Hive account@cryptocompany | [ENG/DEU] HSBI Generator | New Website Function}
^{• Hive account@ccceo.voter | [ENG/DEU] CryptoCompany CCD Voting Service: recently processed votes & activities}
^{• Hive account@powerpaul | [ENG/DEU] Again Testers Needed for New Website Stuff}

Hive account@cryptocompany, I paid out 0.715 HIVE and 0.173 HBD to reward 4 comments in this discussion thread.

I think you do already openly elicit feedback from people. However, if you intend to make it a shareholder-based decisionmaking process, then you'd likely have to use a similar model of weighted decisions that you're currently using to see who gets priority votes, etc. Essentially, a summation of all staked CCD, liquidity pools, and voted posts.

Now, the one problem here is that this can greatly benefit a wealthy stakeholder, while leaving behind the opinions of people with less funds behind. Now, if you want it to more equal, then it can't really be considered as much of a stakeholder decision, and instead you'd simply continue running it as you are now. Maybe by giving stakeholders more power, you'd have more people interested in buying up CCD - but you'd have to make them happy, just like any CEO that answers to their chairpeople. So you'd have to weigh the risks and benefits of both approaches here.

[@PowerPaul:] Thank you very much for your feedback. I agree with you on the topics/aspects you mentioned.

Yes, the model how/why a person has a voice, this aspect needs to be found. I would have different ideas how to regulate that. Via existing values, via a new governance token (which could be a mix of shareholder- and rewarding token), in a linear or non-linear amount/weight of vote/voice weight. Or without any need to consume anything. The possibilities are wide. I didn't found an answer to that, how I would prefer. But I have a tendency.

On the one side I would like to give heavy investors a voice and a benefit, on the other side I don't like to kind of exclude the masses. Because if I exclude a person, I might exclude a worthy brain/view. Plus it would make CCCEO to a elite club, which I don't prefer. CCCEO should be open und usable for every Hivian. And just because a Hivian hasn't invested X USD/HIVE, doesn't mean he hasn't a good idea or opinion.

I would love to reward participation, but I assume I don't would prefer to reward only the rich/wealthy one. There is more reward for the wealthy Hivians in CCCEO - and that is okay and needed. But I don't should exclude the masses on some fundamental things, I think/mean.

Let's say there could be a financial benefit for holding a governance token, the question is: is there more value/growth for CCCEO (and lastly all) at the end for integrating all Hivians or is there more value in selling/reinvesting a few governance token. And I tend to say: the biggest value & growth is, when I motivate & include every voice. At least the possibility to hear this voice. The power for a decision is another point. And for this point, lastly the best decision should be realized; not a decision because it is coming from the biggest fish in the pond. The big fishes need their treatment, respect, reward, all this stuff. But then... For example look at the following graphic where the HP within CCCEO is coming from. I should honor that and give these people a voice, but on the other side I can' only use this as a 1:1 weight. If investing in CCCEO builds up a voice, it looks like I should choose a non-linear model.

That's my view on a few aspects you mentioned. Thank you very much for the dialogue. I welcome that!

^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{!PGM !LOLZ}}}}}}}}}

The nonlinear model is the only option in this case. I like that you are concerned about these issues.
!LOLZ
!INDEED
!MEME

lolztoken.com

Chuck Norris once went on a bicycle ride
and accidentially won the Tour de France.
_{Credit: blumela}

Hive account@cryptocompany, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of iceledy

(8/8)

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

lolztoken.com

Why are ducks good at playing limbo?
Because they can get down.
_{Credit: reddit}

Hive account@freecompliments, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of cryptocompany

(5/10)
Farm LOLZ tokens when you Delegate Hive or Hive Tokens.
Click to delegate: 10 - 20 - 50 - 100 HP

I totally agree with you.
!LOLZ
!MEME

lolztoken.com

What do you get after the animal dinner party?
Stuffed animals.
_{Credit: reddit}

Hive account@freecompliments, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of astramar

(3/8)

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

Ich würde auf jeden Fall stimmen wenn ich es mitbekomme.
!BBH
!PIMP

[@PowerPaul:] Okay, cool! Ich werde schauen und konzipieren, wie wir die obige Initiative umsetzen. Wenn Du Ideen hast, wie man dies deiner Meinung nach im Idealfall machen könnte, dann hast Du natürlich mein Ohr.

Habe Dank für das Feedback!

^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{!PGM !LOLZ}}}}}}}}}

lolztoken.com

What's the difference between a well-dressed man and a tired dog?
The man wears an entire suit, the dog just pants.
_{Credit: reddit}

Hive account@bitandi, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of cryptocompany

(3/10)

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

How do you see it? How would you organize it for your CryptoCompany? How should voices be weighted? How could more co-determination be integrated? Do you see this development as positive? What problems do you see? Would you participate?

So many questions! I don't have equal answers, but I will say that I would participate as much as I am able, if such an opportunity presents itself.

[@PowerPaul:] I assume we would find answers to all this aspects in the course of forming this, if co-participation is desired. Would be a task which I have to fulfill: to coordinate this.

Thank you very much for your dedication!

only if CryptoCompany is profitable for users can it profit itself. It is not a platform for the creator, but for the community.

I love this! Reading about the possibility of becoming a cryptocompanyCEO share-holder, wow. That would be so cool. I enjoy brainstorming ideas, but lack the time or ability to invest into an actual project - so the ability to share thoughts and ideas and perhaps see them become a reality... that is a very attractive concept.

[@PowerPaul:] Okay, thank you. I will gather all the feedback and come back to this topic. I will mention you to keep you updated on this topic.

Thank you very much for your comment, your feedback and your expression!

^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{!PGM !LOLZ}}}}}}}}}

lolztoken.com

Apparently adding herbs to your garbage can makes it smell better.
But I don't have thyme for that rubbish.
_{Credit: reddit}

Hive account@gratefuleveryday, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of cryptocompany

(4/10)
Farm LOLZ tokens when you Delegate Hive or Hive Tokens.
Click to delegate: 10 - 20 - 50 - 100 HP

Hive account@cryptocompany, I paid out 0.715 HIVE and 0.173 HBD to reward 4 comments in this discussion thread.

[@PowerPaul:] Thank you very much for your feedback. I agree with you on the topics/aspects you mentioned.

That's my view on a few aspects you mentioned. Thank you very much for the dialogue. I welcome that!

^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{!PGM !LOLZ}}}}}}}}}

The nonlinear model is the only option in this case. I like that you are concerned about these issues.
!LOLZ
!INDEED
!MEME

lolztoken.com

Chuck Norris once went on a bicycle ride
and accidentially won the Tour de France.
_{Credit: blumela}

Hive account@cryptocompany, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of iceledy

(8/8)

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

lolztoken.com

Why are ducks good at playing limbo?
Because they can get down.
_{Credit: reddit}

Hive account@freecompliments, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of cryptocompany

(5/10)
Farm LOLZ tokens when you Delegate Hive or Hive Tokens.
Click to delegate: 10 - 20 - 50 - 100 HP

I totally agree with you.
!LOLZ
!MEME

lolztoken.com

What do you get after the animal dinner party?
Stuffed animals.
_{Credit: reddit}

Hive account@freecompliments, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of astramar

(3/8)

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

Ich würde auf jeden Fall stimmen wenn ich es mitbekomme.
!BBH
!PIMP

Habe Dank für das Feedback!

^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{!PGM !LOLZ}}}}}}}}}

lolztoken.com

What's the difference between a well-dressed man and a tired dog?
The man wears an entire suit, the dog just pants.
_{Credit: reddit}

Hive account@bitandi, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of cryptocompany

(3/10)

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

How do you see it? How would you organize it for your CryptoCompany? How should voices be weighted? How could more co-determination be integrated? Do you see this development as positive? What problems do you see? Would you participate?

So many questions! I don't have equal answers, but I will say that I would participate as much as I am able, if such an opportunity presents itself.

[@PowerPaul:] I assume we would find answers to all this aspects in the course of forming this, if co-participation is desired. Would be a task which I have to fulfill: to coordinate this.

Thank you very much for your dedication!

only if CryptoCompany is profitable for users can it profit itself. It is not a platform for the creator, but for the community.

[@PowerPaul:] Okay, thank you. I will gather all the feedback and come back to this topic. I will mention you to keep you updated on this topic.

Thank you very much for your comment, your feedback and your expression!

^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{^{!PGM !LOLZ}}}}}}}}}

lolztoken.com

Apparently adding herbs to your garbage can makes it smell better.
But I don't have thyme for that rubbish.
_{Credit: reddit}

Hive account@gratefuleveryday, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of cryptocompany

(4/10)
Farm LOLZ tokens when you Delegate Hive or Hive Tokens.
Click to delegate: 10 - 20 - 50 - 100 HP

Your opinion counts: Do you want co-determination?

An important topic that I want to address. If you are involved with CryptoCompany, this article should be of interest to you.

Ein wichtiges Thema, das ich ansprechen will. Wenn Du mit CryptoCompany zu tun hast, sollte Dich dieser Artikel interessieren.

Your opportunities with CryptoCompany grow ...

Specifically, what do you think about me allowing other CryptoCompany participants to add their voice?

Deine Möglichkeiten mit CryptoCompany wachsen ...

Konkret gefragt: Was hältst Du davon, wenn ich anderen CryptoCompany-Teilnehmern ermögliche, ihre Stimme einzubringen?

My question to you:

Thank you for your time and attention!

Meine Frage an Dich:

Danke für deine Zeit und Aufmerksamkeit!

Now it only remains for me to say... Enjoy your day & stay healthy! See you later in the comments &make the best out of the your time!

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

Now it only remains for me to say... Enjoy your day & stay healthy!

See you later in the comments &
make the best out of the your time!