As more and more young couples begin to wake up to the fact that “the beast system” described in the Biblical “Book of Revelations” is literally coming into full-fledged power before their eyes, there are sure to be more and more of them refusing the collection of biometric data, and/or DNA samples, and the assigning of Social Security Numbers at birth while their babies are still in the hospital.
(Danielle and Christian Holm, courtesy of annistonstar.com.)
If you thought so-called “child protective” “services” (CPS) wouldn’t stoop to using that as an excuse to seize desirable newborns for the adoption market, think again. It has already happened at least once. Consider this link:
Here is an excerpt from the link above:
“What started out as an apparent case of mistaken identity has turned into a nightmare that the family cannot wake up from. They don’t understand why their baby was taken from them, or why he still remains in state custody in foster care while social workers continue to challenge their religious beliefs.
According to a close family friend who contacted Health Impact News, the couple are grieving. The most sacred thing to Danielle and Christian (Holm) is the bond of male and female coming together and giving life with God. This bonding process in the beginning of a baby’s life has been stolen from them.
There was never any reason for their baby to be taken from them to begin with, and even now, they have adequate housing and anything else that could ever be needed and they still don’t have their baby back.”
The couple were itinerant missionaries without a permanent address, but many who know them claim their child would certainly have been very well cared for by this devout young Christian couple, no matter what Alabama DHR (Department of Human Resources) may have had to say. While they did not have a typical OBGYN-delivery planned out, they did consult with midwives on their travels and were well prepared to deliver on their own while at a State Park. Part way through the labor process, some unexpected bleeding took place, and they called for help.
After delivery, they apparently made the hospital personnel "uneasy" by refusing some of the typical (unnecessary) stuff like the ID band, and some other minor post-natal procedures. But when they also declined to declare the baby’s name immediately or to file for a Social Security Number, the paranoid medical “professionals” freaked out and called AL-DHR.
Here is another brief excerpt describing this:
“The source close to the family reports that Danielle and Christian sensed that the hospital staff got a bit nervous when the parents declined a birth certificate and social security number for their baby. There were 2 reasons for their declining the documents. Christian and Danielle felt that the naming of their baby is a spiritual experience. They wanted to wait to decide on a name for their baby until they first had time to bond with and get to know their baby to see what name would be the most appropriate. They also believed that the decision as to whether or not to have a social security number was one that should be left up to the child to make when he is older.”
There are many other sad sidebars to this whole story, which are too detailed to relay here. It even involves a case of mistaken identity, which DHR used to keep the baby despite what the couple feels were the real reasons. But it is clear that once DHR discovered they were wrong and had no basis for the kidnapping, that they then (typically) resorted to every possible means and subterfuge to keep their mistake covered up and to keep the baby separated from its mother.
Perhaps one of their worst exacerbating acts was to issue a gag order on everyone connected with the situation, claiming it was to “protect” the Holms, when it was really, of course, to protect their own malfeasance and criminal coverup. The DHR lawyer even went so far as to say the gag order was valid because common Americans just can't fully understand the intricacies of “confidentiality.” ...lol...
(Bud Turner...the corrupt judge in the case. Courtesy of verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com.)
"Birmingham-area attorney Lisa Chasteen disagrees. She (says) Alabama law regarding confidentiality of juvenile cases is often misused by the system to tell parents that they cannot talk about their own cases, but that is not the way the law is written. Alabama Code § 12-15-133(g) states:
Except for the purposes permitted and in the manner provided by this section, whoever discloses or makes use of or knowingly permits the use of information identifying a child, or the family of a child, who is or was under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, WHERE THIS INFORMATION IS DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY DERIVED FROM THE RECORD OF THE JUVENILE COURT OR ACQUIRED IN THE COURSE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES, [emphasis added] upon conviction thereof, shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court and also may be subject to civil sanctions."
...WHICH the Holms in no way violated, nor COULD have violated, as the information they would have shared had not even been TO any juvenile court, nor was it acquired in the "course of official duties." But never mind the law. CPS never does.
If it had not been for the gag order, it is very likely that the public outcry in this case would have been so strong but that Alabama would have had to have given the child back to the parents almost immediately AND ADMIT THEIR MULTIPLE ERRORS...something the government HATES above all things.
"Chasteen asserts that the confidentiality laws were designed to protect the family from the people working on their case disclosing information to the public. They do not apply to the families themselves talking about their case with friends, family, or the media."
Indeed.
This case is now many months old, and here is an article as to where things currently stand:
http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2018/05/free-baby-holm-part-11-forever.html
An excerpt:
"On Janurary (sic) 30th, 2018 Danielle and Christian Holm lost custody permanently after many attempts in seeking a remedy from the government. The government kidnapped their child only 33 hours after he was born. There was no abuse and there was no threat to the child. The Holms did refuse the socialist insecurity number and the refused the vaccines. The mental torture and strain of the legal system was so bad that they couldn't show up to the trial. They knew it was going to be a farce. Their lives have been threatened and they saw no reason to go to court. The only real issue here is why did the government kidnap their child?"
Why indeed?? Were I a young father at this point in my life, I would be doing the exact same thing with regard to the Social Security Number and the DNA/biometric crap. (I'd probably be OK with medical ID band though.) I am sure there are still conservative areas of the country (like Alabama) where other parents are refusing this stuff, and where they don't pay with the loss of their child. WE JUST AREN'T HEARING ABOUT THOSE.
I can't find out if there is any appeal underway, but SOMEBODY like The Rutherford Institute or The American Center for Law & Justice SHOULD be all over this (along with the Alabama militia groups.) This is an absolute clarion call to patriots and conservatives, and can NOT be allowed to stand as a precedent. There is also an unconfirmed rumor that the baby has since been murdered, and that the murder is being covered up by the use of the tool of a "final judgment" keeping the parents from any contact, or from ever knowing what happened.
While that child is still separated from its parents, it is TRUE to say that the Beast System is now alive and growing in "the land of the free and home of the brave." THIS SHALL NOT STAND!