Cold Dust and Spontaneous Fires on 9/11 - Re-Evaluating Ground Zero's Missing Heat

Source: https://mysticbazaar.substack.com/p/cold-dust-and-spontaneous-fires-on

Most people believe that the Twin Towers were destroyed by an intense heat (either jet fuel or explosives). But the physical evidence actually shows a massive contradiction, the buildings turned to dust, yet the area stayed ‘cool; enough for people to survive.Thermal footage taken minutes before the destruction of WTC 1 and 2 shows that heat was only at the crash sites. The rest of the 110 storey buildings remained at room temperature. The steel was not melting or weakening globally.The thermal footage of the towers standing, is the ‘smoking gun’ that proves the heat was never heigh enough to destroy the buildings.The images show that intense heat was trapped only at the impact floors. The rest of the 110 storey structure appears dark and cool. If the steel were melting or weakening globally, the entire building would have glowed like a radiator.The buildings were clad in aluminium. Aluminium is an incredible conductor of heat, If the fires were as hot as we have been told, the heat would have travelled through the cladding like a lightening bolt, lighting up the thermal camera for dozens of floors. It didn’t.The impossible Jump - While the standing towers were relatively cool, the NASA AVIRIS maps taken five days later showed surface temperatures of 1,376 degrees F. How does a ‘cool’ standing building turn into a 1,300 degree F debris pile?The most significant piece of data is the NASA AVIRIS thermal map taken 5 days after 9/11, which shows dozens of ‘hot spots’ where surface temperatures were recorded at over 1,376 degrees F. NASA thermal image showing the surface temperature of the debris on September 16 2001 and by 23 September 2001 there was no surface temperature being recorded.This is where the official story falls apart. According to physics, a surface that is 1,300degreeF is glowing red hot. On the same days that the thermal readings were taken, hundreds of rescue workers were walking directly on those ‘hot spots’. Photos show firefighters digging by hand and dogs searching the pile. Rubber boots melt at 300degreesF. If the ground were truly 1,300 degreeF, the workers would have been incinerated. First responders reported a strange ‘lukewarm’ heat. While they saw what looked like ‘molten metal’ in the crevices, the ambient air wasn’t boiling.The Scott Pack Anomaly - Firefighters reported their compressed air tanks (Scott Packs) ‘popping’ or ‘exploding’. In a normal fire, these tanks only fail in extreme heat. But on 9/11 they were failing in areas where the air felt relatively cool. The ‘heat’ NASA measured wasn’t traditional fire. As Dr Judy Wood explains the metal was ‘fuming’. the heat was a by product of the metal’s molecular structure being disrupted, which is why it could be ‘hot’ on a sensor but ‘cool’ enought for a human to stand on.Hydraulic Equipment - If the surface temperature of the debris pile was as high as the NASA image showed, then the machinery that was being used to move debris would have failed as it could not stand anything like the heat that we are told was being generated by the surface of the debris.While the towers were being dustified, something strange was happening to vehicles parked blocks away on the West Street and FDR Drive. These cars weren’t hit by falling debris, yet they looked like they had been through a furnace.The Fact - Aluminium engine blocks and zinc door handles were found melted or ‘lathered’ into puddles. Aluminium melts at 1,221 degrees F.In many of these same cars the rubber tires remained fully inflated and the gasoline didn’t explode. In a traditional 1,200 degreeF fire, the tires and fuel would be the first things to go.This is the most famous piece of evidence from Dr Judy Wood’s research. Photos show cars with their paint ‘powdered’ off and metal warped, yet loose office paper lying on the hood or in the backseat that had remained perfectly white and uncharred.The Logic - Paper ignites at 451 degreesF. If the environment was hot enough to melt metal, that paper should have turned to ash instantly. The Conclusion - The ‘heat’ was not in the air. It was targeted energy that reacted with the molecular structure of the metal but ignored the paper.Witnesses including FDNY members, reported cars ‘popping off’ and catching fire in parking lots after the towers were already gone. The Anomaly - There were no fire fronts or flying embers reaching these lots. The cars seemed to be reacting to an invisible energy field that remained in the area, causing the metal to ‘fume’ and eventually ignite hours later. Newbie Summary - Think of a microwave oven. It can boil the water inside a cup while the cup itself stays cool to the touch. On 9/11 an unknown energy acted like a microwave for metal - melting engine blocks while leaving paper and trees completely untouched. This is ‘cold heat’.When the towers came down, they created a massive dust cloud that blanketed Lower Manhattan.The Witness Facts - Hundreds if not 1,000s of people were caught inside that cloud. They didn't suffer thermal burns and their clothes didn’t catch fire. They described the dust as cool or ambient.The Logic - If the towers were ‘molten’ or ‘on fire’ enough to melt cars blocks away, that dust cloud would have been a super heated pyroclastic flow (like a volcano) that would have killed everyone instantly. Instead, people walked out of it alive.If falling debris started the fires, the streets should have been piled high with steel and concrete. Photos of the ‘toasted’ car lots show a thick layer of dust, but a lack of heavy structural debris. Images in order showing the dust cloud, the dust covering the carpark with no sign of fires or flaming debris, then the fires and the after affects of thesePhotos of the toasted car lots show a thick layer of dust, but a lack of heavy structural debris.Dr Judy Wood points out that the buildings didn’t just fall, they turned to microscopic powder in mid air. There wasn’t enough ‘solid’ debris left to cause the kind of mechanical or thermal damage we see on the cars.If you watch the videos of the towers’ destruction, you don’t see massive fireballs or flaming chunks of steel falling into the streets. You did see a grey ‘lather’ of dust.If there were no flaming objects hitting the cars and the dust cloud itself was cool, then the cars ‘popping off’ and melting had to be caused by something invisible - an energy field that was interacting with the metal directly. You are told that falling debris destroyed the cars. But the survivors who were in the dust said it wasn’t hot. The photos show no debris hitting the cars. If there is no fire and no debris, but the metal is still melting, you aren’t looking at an accident you are looking at some other energy effect.For years groups like AE911Truth have claimed that ‘rivers of molten steel’ prove the buildings were blown up with Thermite. While this sounds convincing the physical facts don’t support it. The Heat Problem - Thermite burns at over 4,000 degreeF. If thousands of pounds of thermite were used, the heat would have been so intense that rescue workers couldn’t have gotten within blocks of the site for weeks.The ‘Cool’ Reality - As we have shown, people were walking on the ‘hot spots’ just days later. You cannot have 4,000 degree F chemicals creating a cool dust cloud where paper survives.The Lava Illusion - Most of what looked like molten metal was actually aluminium with other materials. It looks like ‘lava’ because it is liquid but it doesn’t require the impossible temperatures that ‘Truthers’ Claim.The most honest evidence doesn’t come from a conspiracy website - it comes from the government’s own FEMA Report (Appendix C).Scientists studied a piece of steel from WTC 7 and found something impossible. The steel hadn’t just bent or snapped, but it was full of holes looking exactly like ‘swiss cheese’.The report found that the steel had undergone intergranular melting. This means the glue holding the metal atoms together was dissolved. FEMA admitted they had no clear explanation for this. This is exactly what happens during molecular dissociation. The metal didn’t melt because of fire, it thinned and evaporated because an energy field was attacking its atomic structure.This explains why the cars looked ‘toasted’ and why the NASA maps showed heat later on. As you can see in the photo below, there is a ‘lather’ type smoke pouring from one side of WTC1, coming out of solid walls. The ‘heat’ people felt was the energy released as the metal atoms were being forced apart.Lather appearing from one side of WTC 1, clearly escaping through solid walls.If we look at the facts with an open mind, the conclusion is clear.The towers were cool before they fell.The dust cloud was cool as it hit the streets.The paper never burned.Yet the steel turned to Swiss Cheese and car engines melted.Fire and Thermite both fail the paper test. Only some kind of unknown energy effect explains how you can melt a car engine while leaving a piece of paper on the dashboard completely untouched. It wasn’t fire. It wasn’t a bomb. It was a new kind of effect. Check out the rest of the observable evidence in the article below:You can also buy the book Where Did The Towers Go? which details all the observable evidence, I highly recommend it.Leave a commentShare

🔐 Cryptographic Verification

Archived URL: https://mysticbazaar.substack.com/p/cold-dust-and-spontaneous-fires-on

�� CONTENT HASHES:
  SHA-256:  967eb3c002e7a061b4a70ffb6f672ab2e889dfab974869f742fe2acdd704c586
  BLAKE2b:  b1ec1266ec216879a81e5baf246eef81b67dedaba5500ec48f2a145f64f96a55
  MD5:      e40cf017ee1a14521a2a72757c7dba71

�� TITLE HASHES:
  SHA-256:  1a6983571b1250de60ad2cb598d3d51ff34345704d69cf5cee98cf964e211185
  BLAKE2b:  03d0fc3a347cd0af2c38c49626e4ef55116b5844531037cf1798a7b95baa3a5d
  MD5:      a0ca0d89e98a521cf5788b5a6b037cb8

�� INTEGRITY HASHES:
  SHA-256:  481c5c266465da3e73c79f49e6ee9cd381982ce159cf6d8ddb42a486e2f6332f
  BLAKE2b:  0943bd1d88275bb6aef75d094625fb6bb8e91e7e85eed72417909464bd62833d
  MD5:      de8b971b6e1570e329e26d87978467ee

Archived with ArcHive - Client-side cryptographic archival system