As America awaits the outcome of the Brett Kavanagh nomination to the Supreme Court, we recognize that Congress is a very important branch of government, as is the Supreme Court.
Congress has power over much of our life.
We recently saw that the unwillingness of Senator Chuck Schumer to fund the needs of the American military resulted in the put-down of our government.
Therefore, inquiries about our Supreme Court nominees is as important as our review of the right of our Congress people to serve in office.
The Democrats universally declared that they would do everything that they could to oppose the nominee of President Trump to the Supreme Court.
The Democrats went on a campaign to delay and thereby to obstruct the nomination.
Following an anonymous and apparently false claim of misconduct by Brett Kavanagh more than 3 decades earlier, the Democrats declared that Judge Kavanagh could not serve until the BI investigated this “disqualifying “ allegation.
Let us explore this concept as it applies to Congress people.
Chuck Schumer held a meeting in the Hamptons immediately prior to the Kavanagh hearing, during which meeting, it is alleged that Schumer constructed a campaign by the Democrats to delay the Senate hearings.
The FBI should investigate whether the rash of demonstrators interrupting the Senate confirmation hearings were paid to do so by Democrats.
Sexual Misconduct by Democratic Senator Thomas Carper (D. Del.) should be investigated by the FBI
Sexual misconduct by Democratic Congressman Keith Ellison (D. Minn.)
Should be investigated by the FBI
The deliberate lies about the candidate by senator Carmella Harris should be investigated by the FBI.
The disclosure of confidential information or of claimed to be confidential White House papers the Senator Corey (Spartacus) Booker should be investigated by the FBI. Because among other things foreign governments, diplomats of foreign governments would obviously be unwilling to deal openly with our government if their discussions were indiscriminately be subject to disclosure by some political animal.
Accordingly none of: Schumer, Harris, Booker, Ellison or Carper
Should be permitted to serve in Congress, until the FBI completes its investigation.
Likewise, if acme anonymous person should claim that he was subject as a young boy to pedophile sexual misconduct by Senator Charles Schumer and is aide Christopher Hahn and that such victim sent a letter derailing this allegation of pedophile behavior to Senator Diane Feinstein who did not promptly reveal thi8s letter, Neither Schumer nor Feinstein should be permitted to serve n the United States Senate until the FBI has cleared them of these charges.
Until such time as they are cleared, their seats shall remain vacant just as they are demanding that the vacancy on the Supreme Court remain vacant.
If the FBI should undertake an investigation of the charge against Judge Kananaugh, the following questions should be answered:
Regarding the Claimant:
Has this claimant ever donated to democratic candidates or democratic causes?
Did this professor at a California State funded college ever tell her student that they must do everything in their power to block the nomination of Judge Kavanagh?
When did she write her anonymous letter?
When did she declare that she wanted to remain anonymous?
Who leaked her letter to the press?
When was the letter leaked?
When did the claimant decide to take a lie detector test?
Why?
How did she locate the lie detector tester?
Lie detector Testing –R-Us?
Who recommended this lie detector tester?
How much did this test cost?
Who paid for this test?
When did she hire her first attorney?
When did she hire her second attorney?
Who recommended each such attorney?
Who is paying the fees of these attorneys?
How much?
The facts of the allegation:
When did this alleged event occur?
Where was claimant attending high school during the period of this alleged event?
How many of claimant’s classmates attended this alleged party?
Name them
Where did this alleged event occur?
How did the claimant arrive at this party?
Who accompanied her to this party?
How was claimant attired when she arrive art this Party?
Describe the general environs of the building in which the alleged party occurred.
In which room were mot of the attendee at his party congregating (hereinafter referred to as the “Congregation Room”)?
In whose house did (hereinafter referred to as the “Party House”) this alleged party occur?
Had claimant ever before visited this Party House?
Did claimant ever know Judge Kavanagh before the alleged party?
Who were the male attendees at this alleged party?
Did claimant have any drinks prior to her arrival at the alleged party?
If so how many drinks?
Did the claimant have any drinks during the alleged party?
What did claimant drink at the alleged party?
How many drinks did claimant have?
Did Claimant observe any other person deinking at this alleged party?
How did claimant leave the Congregation Room to travel to the bedroom?
Who accompanied claimant on her journey to the bedroom?
The notes of the Psychologist to whom claimant reported the incident:
What was the date of the allege visit to the psychologist.
Did the psychologist take contemporaneous note of the session?
Are these the notes?
The psychologist note state that there were 4 boys in the bedroom with you that evening.
How did claimant get onto the bed?
Name each of the 4 boys whom claimant claims were in the bedroom with her.
Did claimant know Michael Judge prior to the nigh of the alleged party?
How did she know Michael Judge?
Which of the 4 boys was the first to climb onto the bed with claimant?
Name that first boy.
What did hat first boy do in that bed?
Did that first boy touch claimant?
When did the second boy enter the bed?
What did claimant do?
What did the first boy do when the second boy entered the bed?
Did the second boy touch claimant?
The same series of questions should be repeated with respect to the third boy.
When did judge Kavanagh allegedly enter this crowed bed?
What does clement claim that judge Kavanagh did when he entered the bed?
What were the other boys doing at the time that judge Kavanagh allegedly entered the bed?
What physical actions does claimant claim that Michael Judge took with respect to judge Kavanagh?
What does claimant claim that the other boys were dong during this alleged physical action between Bichsel Judge and judge Kavanagh?
How does claimant claim that she got off the bed?
Does claimant claim that anyone assisted her to get out of that bed?
Does claimant claim that she exited the bedroom alone?
Does claimant claim that after she allegedly exited the bedroom that she reentered the Congregation room?
Where does claimant claim that Judge Kavanagh went after he allegedly exited the bedroom?
Where does claimant claim that the other boys allegedly in the bedroom with her went after they allegedly left the bedroom?
Did Claimant mention this alleged incident to any other person at the alleged party after the alleged incident?
How does claimant claim that she arrived at her home after she left the Party House?
How far was claimant’s home from the Party House?
With whom on the Democratic side of the United States Senate did claimant or either of her attorneys or other representatives was this matter discussed?