If an investor wants to auto piolet their votes they can follow a trail, nothing can stop that ever, anyone can always follow someones votes. However, that isnt the point of attack, the point of attack is when the initial vote is cast. If an investor is following a trail of a manual curator, it makes the ones doing the work, the manual curators that get rewarded and investors still earn but just less because they cant front run.
With lazy autovoters, IE people who vote at 4min mark of all "popular" creators and just leaves it, that is destructive to the platform. We need to encourage better curation, which means rewarding manual voters. What is the best way to punish lazy voters and reward manual voters? That is the 100 billion dollar question IMO, if we get curation right, we explode in popularity.
RE: The never-ending discussion surrounding autovotes | Can autovoting be improved or made more fun?