"Very little noise or seismic impact rules out BOTH gravity and explosive demolition."

I disagree. While I grant something is inexplicable about the conversion of the concrete to dust, which I do not understand and have yet to hear anyone else give any plausible explanation for, There clearly was thermite/thermate involved, because a) it was chemically detected, b) there were molten pools of steel for weeks underground, c) obvious molten steel pouring out of the structure during the event, d) there were many tool marks that thermite/thermate leaves on the steel that was cut with it, e) there were eyewitness testimonies of hundreds of survivors regarding explosions, and f) DEWs don't explain the collapse because the damage was beneath the upper floors, and just the dust would have blocked any form of EMF that was disintegrating the structures from above - or that dust would have become superheated plasma as the DEW punched through it. If the DEW disintegrated concrete, concrete dust would not have been transparent to it.

Thanks!

Edit: I am referring mostly to the two towers collapsing, however, DEWs similarly do not explain Bldg. 7 going down because the damage was beneath the upper structure, and could not have cut the supports without first cutting the upper structure into particles. The center collapsing first is classical demolition SOP. The concrete being converted to dust indicates something unknown was applied to the concrete - or I am just relatively unaware that particularization happens in all concrete and steel structures - but, whatever was applied to the structural members was applied within the structure, not from without, and I cannot see how DEW mechanisms could have been inside the structure, nor am I aware of any that particularize concrete.