I love nature. Yeah, people should hike more.

If a man owns the forest, it could be argued that man makes up the rules for that place because private property rights, land rights. It is that simple. But it is assuming it is owned by an individual and not by groups of people or other options. So, when you go hiking, you follow the rules of the land owners. But that applies to private land. But if you were talking hypothetically or theoretically of like alleged public lands, then that is a different thing all together. Private land can be understood. Public land is a complex thing that would take a long time to investigate. And alleged public lands can be different depending on the country you are in.

Laws and other things relating to public lands in Vietnam may be different than what you might find in America and other countries. But at the same time, there are some similarities. But it is critical not to conflate public land with private land.

It can be said that tax payers pay for public lands meaning the tax payers own the public land some would argue. I'm not going to say they do but it depends and it would take a while to debate. But they make really good arguments. So, if you own the land, then you might be able to make up the rules. So, it really comes down to who owns the land. And even when a person thinks they own land, they might not really own the land depending on the types of laws that might be applicable in those types of situations.

A positive sense of discrimination is in the act of eating your food for example. When you eat your food, you are not sharing your food with other people. Only you are eating your food. That is not bad. You are eating your food. But somebody could say, "You're discriminating against me because you are not sharing your food with me."

Of course you can say, "But this has nothing to do with discrimination," and you would be right. But the problem is that people redefine and weaponize and twist words. All kinds of words are twisted so much and for so many decades. For example, gay means happy. Gay does not have to mean homosexuality. Gay can also mean something silly, dumb, weird, not so cool, not so exciting, pretty lame, pretty boring, pretty depressing.

Discrimination can sometimes be associated with censorship. Again, not saying that these two words should be connected but the perception can still connect these two words. For example, a bakery store refused to bake a wedding cake for 2 gay people who were getting married. So, some people said that was discrimination. Later on, there was censorship on Facebook. Some people started comparing the censorship of Facebook with what they called censorship at that bakery shop with that cake. That is how discrimination was connected to censorship.

And then there has been debates regarding whether or not Facebook should be allowed to censor as a platform and/or publisher depending whether or not Facebook is public property and/or private property of private companies and/or the list goes on and on regarding many different things as we have all been exploring for the past several years or in other ways for many decades.