I think it is safe to say that this is a divisive issue with no objective answer. Here is some perspective:
- Prediction Markets (auger) are worth as much as STEEM
- Steem has the potential to offer more accessible form of prediction markets than auger
- The current implementation is dangerously close to a cleverly disguised vote-buying strategy which
recently outlined the potential consequences of an upvote only system.
- I have previously stated that if
has significant value, then it should be baked into the protocol, made provably fair, and have the overhead slashed.
At the very least, I think steemit.com needs to organize content and display it in ways that are optimized for the use case.
RE: Community Question: If you're an investor who actually buys STEEM, does the popularity of "pick games" attract you?