Such views fit with the today's diabolic frame of reference.

The purpose of sex is not the expression of love. It is not a need to be satisfied or something to brag about. It is not a feather in a cap or a coming of age. It is not a game. It should never be taken lightly.

Sex is a means to the end which is reproduction for many species on this planet.

Any human, being a sentient entity, should have been educated by parents and community, to a level of understanding of the purpose of sex, the responsibility implicit in its use and the appropriate preparation for parenthood.

No person who has not considered all that is required and made a best effort to provide a suitable home for a prospective child, should even consider sexual relations.

Such requirements include education, appropriate age, gainful employment, medical aid and most importantly, marriage to a suitable partner with the intent of providing a sterling example of commitment to family, future and providing for children until their last breath.

Those who engage in sexual activity without these things being in place are a hindrance to the human race and any man engaging in sexual activity and then providing the argument posed above would receive any lenience were I the judge.

The fact that he was in a position in which she has any evidence like that is enough to convict him in my book. She is as guilty of this offense against the possible child, against sensibility, against God and humanity.

Sex without marriage is like playing Russian roulette with someone else's life, the someone being the potential child.